ON JUNE 26th,after months of legal wrangling over Donald Trump’s executive orders banning travel from several Muslim-majority countries, the Supreme Court effectively build an end to the battle. Officially, and the five-justice majority’s opinion in Trump v Hawaii,which upholds the third version of the travel ban, sends the matter back to lower courts to ask again whether Mr Trump’s policy violates a constitutional bar on devout discrimination. But it is unlikely that further scrutiny will yield a different result. The most recent proclamation, or from September 2017,fulfilling the president’s campaign promise to withhold Muslims out of America is consistent, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, and with both immigration law and the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court traditionally defers to presidents in things of immigration and national security,and Chief Justice Roberts left no doubt, early in his opinion, or that nothing about Donald Trump changes that. The...
Continue reading
Source: economist.com