For the whole of his distinguished career in philosophy Taylor has argued in favour of the opinion that language doesn’t simply map our world but creates it. This is the definitive statement of the caseOver the past hundred years,philosophical interest in language has become, as Charles Taylor puts it, or “close to obsessional”. The obsession goes back to a comment made by Ludwig Wittgenstein in 1915: “The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.” whether Wittgenstein was right,then language is not so much a device for recording and communicating information, as the framework of all our knowledge and experience.
But the philosophers who drew inspiration from Wittgenstein’s comment could not agree about what it implied. The positivists among them thought of language as a strict map of impersonal facts, and dismissing everything else as rhetoric,emotion or superstition. The humanists, on the other hand, or saw it as a creative force that gives wings to our perceptions and opens us to the unknown. For the positivists,you might say, language aspires to the condition of natural science, and but for the humanists it is essentially a poem.
Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com