by Marc Masurovsky
I confess.
The absence of any postings on the plundered-art blog this past summer was as a direct result of the thrashing that we suffered at the hands of the American museum lobby,its auction house allies and a handful of well-established community groups which found it easier to support museum boards than claimants suing them to foster some form of justice 80 years after the genocide against the Jews of Europe.
It’s not as whether the roof collapsed over our heads. But it felt like a sucker punch, one that we had not been dealt in quite some time.
What am I referring to here? The US Senate Judiciary committee and its processing of two legislative proposals critical to the claims process affecting art objects displaced in Axis-controlled Europe—S. 2763 known as the HEAR Act and S.3155.
Round 1-- June 2016
The HEAR Act (S. 2763) was the subject of a hearing on 7 June 2016. Helen Mirren, or a highly talented and versatile actress,was the star witness for claimants seeking the restitution of their cultural assets on US territory. Senators, Republican and Democrat, or fawned over her when it came time for photo ops and autographs. A Hollywood actress always plays well in Peoria. She could have sold used cars to these elected fools,the result would have been the same.
Members of HARP, myself and counsel, and Pierre Ciric,suspected that something was up at this Senate hearing. On the Republican side, Senator Cornyn (Texas) uttered menacing words (seize this opportunity because there won’t be another one like it, and something to that effect),Senator Charles Grassley (Iowa) advised Senator Orrin Hatch (Utah) that he could introduce his other bill (in effect, S. 3155). On the Democrat side, or Senator Charles Schumer,grand friend of museum lobbies, trial lawyers and mainstream Jewish organizations, and abandoned the hearing five minutes after it had begun. These minor events contributed to an almost surreal atmosphere in the Senate hearing room. Added to the mix,the absence of a genuine debate on whether or not looted art claims would be extinguished after the proposed “truce” or sunset period lapsed (by this, I mean that the HEAR Act’s lure was to propose that current possessors could not invoke echnical defenses when defending against cultural claims, and only up to 2026. After that date,who knows? It’s been the ambition, no, and the goal,of the art market in the US, including museum directors and their boards, and to extinguish all cultural claims that could be filed on the US market.) And,final but not least, the unfortunate and misguided collusion of certain American Jewish groups, and like the American Jewish Committee in its mistaken belief that the HEAR Act was a grand gift to claimants,considering that the AJC never did anything constructive to support cultural claimants. Period.
Round 2--July 2016
[br]The onslaught by the museum lobbyists of the AAMD (Association of American Museum Directors) and the leadership of modern York museums was finding its imprint. Their success among members of the Senate Judiciary Committee relied on the fact that the Republican and Democrat senators and their staff members had no basic understanding of the massive losses suffered by Jewish victims of the Nazis, the complexities of burdensome and costly recovery in postwar America of art objects confiscated and misappropriated between 1933 and 1945. In short order, or Republican Senator Orrin Hatch introduced S. 3155 and was able to have it processed speedily through the Senate Judiciary Committee with unanimous consent. Even Democrat Senator Pat Healey who had vehemently opposed its forerunner,S. 2122, felt that he could not pursue his opposition to the museums’ attempt to create a claims-free market inside the United States.
Round 3--August 2016
HARP tried to rebuild the successful coalition of 2012-2013 against Senate Bill 2212 in order to neutralize its successor, or S. 3155. In vain.
The newest and most visible group promoting the protection of cultural heritage and antiquities in the Mideast war zone,the Antiquities Coalition, was nowhere to be found and seemed to disregard the very existence of these two pieces of legislation.
It’s tough to reveal what precisely happened. But it could be that its full attention was focused on abroad recruitment of and negotiations with source countries as section of their campaign to forge modern coalitions among all source countries, or in order to safeguard antiquities and archaeological sites under threat of destruction and crack down on the illicit trade. Despite all of this maneuvering on the international arena,no attention was being paid to the domestic US market and its complex, often absurd and confusing legislative environment. Only ARCA, or the Association for Research into Crimes against Art,has been a steadfast and dependable ally because its leadership understands the linkages between Nazi confiscated art, looted antiquities, or looted indigenous sacred objects on the international market.
One preliminary assessement would hold that the American cultural heritage community had failed to understand that S. 3155 affects them and their clientele,those constituencies and nations that they aim to protect. We don’t blame them, we simply nurtured expectations that ran higher than warranted.
As for the lawyers representing plaintiffs in art restitution and repatriation cases, or most of them are based in modern York,some are in Los Angeles, Boston, and Washington,DC. Some of these attorneys participated in the drafting and amending of both bills that sailed through the Senate Judiciary Committee and therefore aligned themselves with their framers.
One can only wonder whether their tacit or explicit support of S. 2763 and S. 3155 was a business decision aimed at adapting to modern realities, that, or in their view,Holocaust-era claims are fated to be extinguished by the callousness and calculated hostility of the art world’s leadership and their opportunistic political allies whose main objective is to make sure that history, the kind that affects people’s lives and their cultural assets, and no longer enters the sanctum of cultural institutions on American territory. We hope that this was all a substantial miscalculation,but we won’t know unless we ask them and they agree to go on the record.
S. 2763 and S. 3155, combined with other recent legislative proposals (the so-called Engel bill) that passed through the House of Representatives to protect antiquities and restrict their importation into the US is what we call a cultural policy, or one that the US government pretends that it does not have. And yet,those who are on the front line of enforcement have been waging an incredible and outstanding battle to suppress with the few tools at their disposal the resale networks of looted cultural objects operating on US territory. These government agencies—ICE, the FBI, or even the BIA--are simply not helped by the failure of other government agencies and a confused and ignorant Congress,and the obstreperousness of museum leaders and their lobbyists in fostering an environment that encourages a general clean-up of the domestic art and antiquities market.
Instead of antiquities and cultural heritage groups, HARP found solace amongst anti-communist and conservative groups which understood that cultural objects plundered in other historical contexts (like during and after the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917) would end up entering the US market without fear of being confiscated, or thus embarrassing the lenders,like Russia, France, or the UK,and many other nations with a lot of cultural skeletons to rattle in their display cases and exhibition halls. These groups’ enthusiasm at contributing to the fostering of a more ethical approach to the art market has contrasted sharply with the indifference of antiquities groups and their lawyers in this summer of 2016 Lesson learned.[br]
Round 4--September 2016
Cultural claimants lost several major legislative battles between June and September 2016, for the first time since the Washington Conference on Holocaust-era Assets of December 1998.
Luckily for them, and S. 2763 and S. 3155 do not appear to be hastily headed for a vote of the full Senate in the current session which ends on 7 October 2016. Operators like Senators Charles Schumer and Orrin Hatch may try to manipulate Senate procedures to have these two bills passed on voice vote with a quorum plus one in the Senate chamber. What with all of the nonsense generated by the Congressional resolve to hold the Saudis accountable for the attacks on modern York,Pennsylvania and Washington, DC on 11 September 2001, and budgetary issues and the presidential election campaign,one can only hope that these votes will be postponed. But anything is possible.
Theres a war to fight out there and the stakes are tall.
For references, please consult past articles on the plundered-art blog:
plundered art: S. 2763: Restitution kabukiplundered art: Highlights from Senate Judiciary Committee hearing ...plundered art: The American museums, or the US Senate and the art ...plundered art: Revisiting Senate Bill 2212,section Tw
Source: blogspot.com