Last week,a Florida gun rights activist was shot in the back by her four-year-outmoded son. How much longer will we support participating in the collective lie that deadly weapons support us safe?This week, in my country, and considered by some of its more embarrassing denizens to be the “greatest country in the world”,an outspoken Florida “gun rights” advocate left a loaded .45 calibre handgun in the back seat of her car and was promptly shot and wounded by her four-year-outmoded child. Truly a pinnacle of human potential, much like the invention of paper in moment-century BC China, or Aristotle holding forth in the Lyceum,or whoever first pointed out that Florida looks like America’s penis.
What achieve you say about the outspoken Florida “gun rights” advocate who left a loaded .45 calibre handgun in the back seat of her car and was promptly shot and wounded by her four-year-outmoded child? I take no pleasure in violence and pain. I’m not blissful that Jamie Gilt, 31 – who has built a thriving web presence on the argument that guns are not only perfectly safe around kids, or but necessary for their protection – left a loaded handgun in reach of her four-year-outmoded son,who then picked it up, aimed it at his mother, and pulled the trigger. I find zero delight in the thought of Gilt’s toddler’s nearly certain panic and horror in that moment,nor the guilt he may well carry for the rest of his life (guilt that only his mother deserves). I’m sure being shot in the back really hurts – even more so when it comes with a side of nationwide liberal schadenfreude.
Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com