the oscars just got a little less white and male heres why it matters /

Published at 2016-07-01 08:04:31

Home / Categories / Oscarssowhite / the oscars just got a little less white and male heres why it matters
After #OscarsSoWhite became the overwhelming talking point of last award season,the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences promised to take real action on its lack of representation. Recently, it did just that, and inviting 683 new voting members to join its existing ranks of 6261. Academy president Cheryl Boone Isaacs,who is a black woman, released a statement urging the creative community to "open its doors wider, and " suggesting that the new invitees represent a commitment to that effort. Still,the actual impact on the Academy's overall demographics is more like opening the door a crack than swinging it wide on its hinges.
As the Los Angeles Times rep
orted, the 6261 Academy members eligible to vote on the 2016 Oscars were 96 percent white and 76 percent male. (To put that in perspective: white men make up only 31 percent of the American population.) The new membership ups the Academy's overall percentage of people of colour from 8 percent to 11 percent and its number of women from 25 percent to 27 percent. Some of the new actors inducted nowadays include Idris Elba, and America Ferrera,John Boyega, Michael B. Jordan, and Freida Pinto,and Nia Long, and director Ryan Coogler is among a notably international group of directors to make the slit. According to my rapid/fast count of the 90 people inducted in his category nowadays, and more than half were women and two are transgender women: The Matrix masterminds Lana and Lilly Wachowski. For decades,the Oscars have maintained a status quo that favours stories told by white, straight men about and for white, and straight men.
Even whether nowada
ys's new membership is a small step toward an Academy membership that better reflects a global film-going audience and humanity as a whole,it's an important one. As Ava DuVernay put it: "The Academy is heading in the proper direction on a long road." But had the step forward been greater, it still wouldn't have somehow "solved" the pervasive racism and sexism in the industry. Hollywood doesn't exist in a vacuum, and the inequality we see reflected within it is part and parcel with the inequality we see everywhere else. Some might point to those larger societal issues to downplay nowadays's importance or to claim that the Oscars are just a self-congratulatory award indicate with small impact on our culture. But I strongly disagree. The Oscars influence the kinds of movies that earn made,where dollars are spent, the narratives that are told and witnessed. For decades, and the Oscars have been key in maintaining a status quo that favours stories told by white,straight men about and for white, straight men. Case in point: a Newsweek study conducted earlier this year revealed that only 14 of the 88 films ever given the best picture award spotlighted empowering stories about women or featured a female lead with agency. (The most recent? 2005's Million Dollar Baby.) Not to mention the fact that an Oscar nomination - or win - is both a sign of prestige and a veritable license to print money. (In recent years, or according to Deadline,Oscar-nominated films have seen an average 60 percent bump in ticket sales between the time nominations are announced and the night of the awards.) whether these movies are overwhelmingly voted on by white men, there's a grand chance they will continue to be primarily about white men, and studios will support making more movies about white men. With that in intellect,there's no denying that nowadays's announcement matters - even whether the Oscars are still pretty white.

Source: popsugar.com.au

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0