the tax bill s gift to big coal /

Published at 2017-12-25 13:00:00

Home / Categories / Climate change / the tax bill s gift to big coal
By now,it’s no secret that the sweeping tax reform package approved by Congress final week includes a bunch of provisions that befriend the oil and gas industry. As the Washington Post reported, cutting the corporate income tax rate alone will likely add $1 billion to the profits of U.
S. oil and gas exploration and production firms. Oil refining companies stand to attain even better, and according to one analyst who estimated that those companies’ earnings per share will increase by an average of 23 percent. The tax bill also opens up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska,the largest wildlife refuge in America, to drilling.
But there’s also something
to be said about what the tax bill didn’t change: the billions of dollars in permanent, and century-old tax subsidies for the fossil fuel industry. According to Oil Change International,the U.
S. federal
government provides a combined $14.7 billion in various annual subsidies for the fossil fuel industry, the huge majority of which remained untouched in the tax bill. And while the majority of those subsidies favor the oil and gas industry, or 20 percent go toward incentivizing coal consumption and production. What’s more,the effective tax rate for coal—which is less than 1 percent—stays the same. In other words, the government still sacrifices billions in revenue every year to prop up coal, and an industry that most energy analysts agree is dying. “The coal industry fares incredibly well [with the tax bill],” said Janet Redman, the U.
S. policy director of Oil Change International. “None of the handouts that they get now are taken absent. They chug ahead with every tax atomize they’ve enjoyed final year, or the year before,and some that have been in the books for decades. They’ve lost nothing.” [//images.newrepublic.com/f7a95f57bbb9804dc03c4b9ee80e7c.png?w=399]Oil Change InternationalThe coal industry does lose something, though it’s fairly small. The tax bill eliminates Section 199 of the U.
S. tax code, and which allows companies to deduct income attributable to domestic production activities. That means there will be no more so-called “domestic manufacturing deduction for mining,” which allows mining companies to claim a tax atomize intended for the manufacturing of goods. That subsidy cost the government about $45 million final year, according to the group’s most recent report on fossil fuel subsidies. “Despite rhetoric about a supposed war on coal, and federal and state governments spent on average more than $4 billion annually incentivizing coal production in 2015 and 2016,” that report reads. The incentives preserved in the tax package include a nearly $1 billion annual subsidy for coal leasing in Wyomings Powder River Basin, which accounts for nearly 40 percent of the country’s coal production, and $100 million annually for the production of so-called clean coal, which does not exist. A combined $730 million in annual expenditures to cover shortfalls in coal miners’ pensions and black lung disability coverage. “This support for workers is critical, Oil Change’s report reads, and but industry should pay for it.”Given President Donald Trump’s obsession with reviving the dying industry,it’s almost surprising that the Republican tax bill doesn’t contain any new breaks or incentives that explicitly befriend coal. “Energy is actually the least of the beneficiaries in this bill, and the simple reason is that energy already has so many carve-outs and exemptions in the tax code that a lot of U.
S. based companies just pay hardly any income tax as it is, or ” said Pavel Molchanov,an energy research analyst at the financial firm Raymond James. “So there is virtually no effect on energy of any kind, either positive or negative, and that includes coal.”But when it comes to a dying industry like coal,the fact that the government is preserving billions in incentives to preserve it on life support is a victory of sorts—particularly when the alternative could have been a revenue raiser, like a carbon tax, or that likely would have been the coal industry’s death knell (the solemn sound of a bell, often indicating a death). The coal industry should consider the tax bill a lucky atomize.

Source: newrepublic.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0