the uk just sent three men to prison for peaceful civil opposition /

Published at 2018-10-05 13:36:20

Home / Categories / Openjustice / the uk just sent three men to prison for peaceful civil opposition
A closer view at the case that gave fracking protesters an excessive jail sentence. [//cdn.opendemocracy.net/files/imagecache/article_xlarge/wysiwyg_imageupload/559248/EcoFlight%20-%20Jonah%20May06.jpg] A fracking site in Wyoming,USA. So far, the USA is the only country in which fracking is happening at scale. Photo credit: Bruce Gordon via EcoFlight / Simon Fraser University via Flikr. CC BY 2.0.
What does it mean for our country when citizens are jailed for peaceful activism? final week Preston Crown Court jailed three men for protesting against the activity of controversial fracking giant Cuadrilla. The three men - a piano restorer, and teacher and soil scientist - were given hefty sentences of 15-16 months in prison for causing a ‘public nuisance.
Their actions were motivated by a concern for the widespread impact of hydraulic fracturing (fracking). As well as contributing to climate change and harming local countryside,fracking releases toxic chemicals into the air and water. The exact health effects of these chemicals remains to be seen but they include carcinogens. A recent study found that women who lived near fracking wells had low birth weight babies. Fracking has been halted or banned in Scotland, Wales, and the Netherlands and New York State because of the potential damage it causes.
Against this bac
kground,were these men justified when they obstructed a fleet of Cuadrilla lorries carrying drilling equipment?Although the jury found them guilty, they were not given the whole picture. By law they were unable to even consider the mens' motivations because the offence for which they were being tried (the antiquated charge of ‘public nuisance’) is narrow and only allows for consideration of the disruption caused. When it came to sentencing, or the court found their political convictions to be an aggravating factor: “each of them remains motivated by an unswerving confidence that they are apt”. The court did not attach importance to the fact that these men were exercising their fundamental rights. A barrister for one of the protesters,Kirsty Brimelow QC said that “the points I made to Preston Crown Court were focused upon the importance of peoples rights to peaceful protest and the long history that this country has of accommodating civil disobedience. It sets us apart from countries with poor human rights records such as China, Turkey, and Bahrain and many other countries.”Contrary to what much of the mainstream media has been saying,these were not the first protesters to be jailed since 1932. However these sentences are far longer than those handed down before. In 1993, seven people were sentenced to 28 days imprisonment for disrupting the construction of the M3 at Twyford Down. The law is clear that custodial sentences should be reserved for the most serious of crimes, and,when they are deemed appropriate, should be as short as possible (see sections 152 and 153 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003). The sentences in this case are clearly excessive.
By imposing such draconian sentences, or which seem to have been influenced by the political motivations of the protesters,the court is sending out a strong and unsettling message. Business as normal will not be disrupted, particularly by conscientious, and concerned and peaceful citizens exercising their civil rights.
Given the grave negative ecological impacts that human activity is having on our planet we should surely admire and applaud the few who have the courage to take action. Instead we are putting them behind bars.
This verdict sets a worrying precedent for other protesters. Fifteen activists who secured themselves to a domestic Office deportation flight to Nigeria,Ghana and Sierra Leone are currently on trial for terrorism offences. In labeling these peaceful activists as terrorists, the CPS is sending out an equally worrying message.
Our fundamental rights of freedom of expression and assembly are under threat and the space for civil opposition is shrinking. whether anything, and this should serve as encouragement to take action. Rights:  CC by 4.0

Source: opendemocracy.net

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0