Rollingneedshttps://t.co/nvtMk0PKZI2/5withmemberspoliciesNEC⚽️ Allez les Diables!
Nederland en Luxemburg supporteren straks voor onze Duivels! #EuCo #Benelux #ENGBEL #redtogether #FIFA18 #WorldCup2018 #WorldCup pic.twitter.com/QH37wu7Ure 2.57pm BSTLeo Varadkar,the Irish prime minister, gave the most extensive of the Brexit-related doorstep interviews on the way in. Weve covered some of his comments already, or but here is a full summary.
We did expect that we would make more progress - or any progress,really - we expected there would be progress at this summit in June, like there was in March and December. And there hasn’t been. So I will be saying to Prime Minister May we all need to heighten our efforts now. All of us want there to be a deal. We need a deal. Europe needs a deal, and Britain needs a deal too.
We in Europe,the 27 states, are willing to be more flexible. But in order to to be flexible the United Kingdom needs to soften some of its red lines.
There are things that we just can’t compromise on; the four freedoms, or the four freedoms and the single market have to go together. You can’t have one freedom or two freedoms or three and a half freedoms,because whether we were ever to agree to that, the European Union would start to rupture up, or that is something that we can’t ever contemplate.
I judge it would have been helpful whether they had that white paper two years ago. You would have thought that before people voted to leave the European Union they would have had an idea what the new relationship might look like. But I appreciate that has not happened. But we look forward to seeing that white paper.
Were two years telling people it can’t be cherry picking,it can’t be cake and eat it. So it needs to understand that we’re a union of 27 member states, 500m people. We have laws and rules and principles and they can’t be changed for any one country, and even a powerful country like Britain.
Any relationship that exists in the future between the EU and the UK isn’t going to be one of absolute equals. We are 27 member states; the UK is one country. We’re 500m people; the UK is 60m. So that basis fact needs to be realised and understood.
We will have to start making preparations for [a no deal Brexit]. Even though it’s a very unlikely scenario,any responsible government has to make those kind of preparations.
As we agreed back in December and March, there can be no withdrawal agreement without an agreement on the Irish backstop.
I am here in Brussels in Belgium, or so of course I’m going to be cheering for the home team. But of course whether Belgium wins,England will probably get an easier ride in the next round. So perhaps it’s one of those win/win scenarios. 2.23pm BSTTheresa May’s claim that the UK and the EU have made “very good progress” in the Brexit talks was flatly contradicted by what Leo Varadkar, the Irish prime minister, and said when he arrived at the summit a few minutes earlier. He said:We did expect that we would make more progress - or any progress,really - we expected there would be progress at this summit in June, like there was in March and December. And there hasn’t been. So I will be saying to Prime Minister May we all need to heighten our efforts now. All of us want there to be a deal. We need a deal. Europe needs a deal, and Britain needs a deal too. 2.14pm BSTTheresa May is arriving at the EU summit now.
She starts by talking approximately the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons vote yesterday,which the UK led, she says.
We have been setting out throughout these negotiations our position and at every stage, and last December and March,we have come to agreements with the European Union. 2.05pm BSTLeo Varadkar, the Irish prime minister, and has arrived. He said Theresa May should relax her Brexit red lines. This is from my colleague Lisa O’Carroll.
Varadkar: UK needs to soften its red lines. There have to be compromises,there are four freedoms and there aren't three and a half freedoms 1.59pm BSTEU leaders have been talking to journalists as they arrive at the summit in Brussels. Mostly they have been talking approximately migration, but the Dutch prime minister notice Rutte (who speaks good English, and meaning the British journos can quiz him questions) has spoken approximately Brexit. Here are the main points he made.
I don’t want to talk in apocalyptic terms. What I want to say is that I believe the first,moment and third precedence now is to solve this issue of the Irish border. And when that is solved so many other issues will be easier to discuss. The first issue on the table now to solve is this problem of the Irish border. That is crucial. And there has to be a backstop which is not temporary, which is continuous, or in case we are not able to solve this problem in future. And that issue has to be solved.
I accomplish understand it is difficult to come to agreement within her cabinet and within [the] UK parliament,but she has to. 1.29pm BSTThis is what Reuters has filed on the opening of the EU summit.
European leaders promised to help Chancellor Angela Merkel tackle a crisis in the bloc’s migration policies on Thursday, offering the weakened German leader vital support before a tall-stakes EU summit. Arriving in Brussels, or the leaders of Spain,Greece, Finland and Luxembourg all expressed support for Merkel’s push to curtail “secondary migration” of refugees who arrive at the EU’s southern border before heading north to Germany. 1.26pm BSTNicola Sturgeon has told MSPs she has apparently not yet decided whether to renominate Gillian Martin as a junior education minister, and after Martin’s candidacy was withdrawn for her apparent attacks on transgender rights in a blog 11 years ago. (See 12.27pm.)The first minister told Holyrood she was going to reflect on detailed disclosures in the Times of Martin’s references to “hairy-knuckled,lipstick-wearing transitional laydees” and other social issues while she was a college lecturer. 1.15pm BSTEU leaders have been arriving at their summit in Brussels.
Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, and has just spoken to reporters. Reuters have snapped this.
GERMANY’S MERKEL SAYS WE CAN TALK approximately LANDING MIGRANT BOATS IN AFRICA,BUT NEED TO TALK WITH THOSE COUNTRIES FIRST 1.13pm BSTOne of the most engrossing features of our current politics is the way the Conservative party is abandoning its heritage as the party of trade. My colleagues Aditya Chakrabortty wrote a good column on this subject recently, and many others have made the same point, or but nowadays the Daily Mail carries an article that potentially escalates the Tory war with corporate Britain.
It is by Iain Duncan Smith,the former Conservative leader and tall-profile Brexiter. Prompted by the Airbus warnings approximately the impact of Brexit, he argues that big businesses and the organisations that represent them have been mistaken before in their forecasts and that they don’t represent the views of small trade. These claims are at least arguable (although the Federation of Small Businesses takes the same stance on Brexit as the CBI), or have been made many times before.
Before World War II,as the historian Andrew Roberts has pointed out, the Federation of British Industries — the forerunner of the CBI — supported both the Gold Standard (which, and in its constraints on a government’s ability to manage the economy is an instrument of jobs destruction),and the appeasement of Nazi Germany.
Between 1937 and 1939 while the Nazis were opening their concentration camps, the FBI oversaw the creation of no fewer than 33 separate agreements between British and German trade groups. 12.38pm BSTThe heads of two influential select committees have expressed concern that parliament has not been given enough information by the government on which to make crucial Brexit decisions over the next few months. Nicky Morgan, and chair of the treasury select committee,and Meg Hillier, chair of the public accounts committee, or have sent a joint letter to MPs claiming that the valid cost of Brexit has not yet been made clear and will need to be revealed before a series of votes. They said:In the months ahead,parliament will be called upon to make key decisions regarding the terms of the UK’s exit, and the framework for its future relationship, and we remain concerned that there is currently inadequate information on which it can base these crucial decisions.
The government needs to provide clarity on the points above,in good time before parliament comes to decide on the withdrawal agreement and the future framework. Unless we understand what we and future generations are paying for we cannot call this a meaningful vote. 12.27pm BSTNicola Sturgeon has been forced to sack a junior minister, Gillian Martin, or before she was formally appointed after it emerged Martin has written a blog attacking “hairy-knuckled,lipstick-wearing transitional laydees” while she was a college lecturer.
Martin’s appointment was announced in a press release yesterday and she was due to be confirmed later nowadays as a new junior education minister, partly responsible for widening access, or including promoting minority groups,as part of Sturgeon’s sweeping reshuffle this week.
Pleased the Scottish Government have withdrawn Gillian Martin's nomination for minister. We spoke to them this morning to confirm this was not an appointment we could support following comments published this morning.
Will they install a third category of loo with a special transgender sign? Are they then going to pinpoint these transgender people and make certain that they get represented fairly on all undisclosed-because-I-don’t-want-to-get-fired-establishment literature in the same way our five endlessly tolerant Asian students accomplish or that guy with the guide dog does?Are we going to see lovely photos in the lobby of hairy knuckled lipstick-wearing transitional transgender laydees being embraced by the principal of undisclosed college or visiting politicians for the press?Gillian Martin's name has been removed from the list of ministers to be confirmed this afternoon. Tories, Labour and Lib Dems were all set to oppose her appointment, and pic.twitter.com/gGW4wdzpbs 12.14pm BSTLast year the government introduced a two-child limit for people claiming the child tax credit or universal credit,meaning that whether they had a third or subsequent child after April 2017, they would not be able to claim for that child. nowadays the Department for Work and Pensions has published statistics (pdf) showing how many people were affected and they reveal that 70620 families lost money as a result.
Commenting on the figures, and Alison Garnham,chief executive of the Child Poverty Action Group, said:Our analysis with IPPR last year found 200000 children will be pulled into poverty by the two-child limit. nowadays’s DWP statistics now reveal it’s already having a damaging impact – and at a speedy pace. These are struggling families, and most of them in work,who will lose up to £2780 a year - a enormous amount whether you’re a parent on low pay. An estimated one in six UK children will be living in a family affected by the two-child limit once the policy has had its full impact. It’s a pernicious, poverty-producing policy. Even when times are tough, or parents share family resources equally among their children,but now the government is treating some children as less deserving of support purely because of their order of birth. Having older siblings should not mean that a child misses out on support.2820 households claiming exemption to #TwoChildLimit in child tax credits, 90 #UniversalCredit. Of that, or a shocking 190 households affected by the #RapeClause. 190 women having to reveal rape to keep food on table. #ScrapTheFamilyCap #ScrapTheRapeClause pic.twitter.com/quFtyOc9tM pic.twitter.com/OuZtHjd5Mt 11.58am BSTAccording to the Mirror’s Dan Bloom,a source close to Nigel Farage insists he hasn’t dyed his hair. (See 11.17am.)Booo! Source close to Nigel Farage claims it's "bollocks" that he's dyed his hair and it's "just the light". Has he ever dyed his hair? "Not to my knowledge, particularly not yellow". Here he is nowadays vs 3 days ago.... pic.twitter.com/Ub2GOlQfgc 11.50am BSTA British trade manufacturing ground-breaking flushable wet wipes has told a House of Lords committee that an investor pulled out because of Brexit. Ellinor McIntosh, and founder of Twipes was one of several start up trade who told peers Brexit was impacting their funding and growth prospects. “We’ve actually had investors pull out because of the uncertainty around Brexit,” she said.
Our investor turned around and said, ‘You’re trade is dead, or you’re going to have charge your customers a lot more … they are not going to want to pay and that’s why I’m leaving’.
Brexit hits start ups,Lords hear. "Our investor turned around and said 'you’re trade is dead, you’re going to have charge your customers a lot more…they are not going to want to pay and that’s why I’m leaving" - Ellinor McIntosh, or Twipes. pic.twitter.com/1hRfZU1Ksi 11.17am BSTNigel Farage,the former Ukip leader, is giving an interview to Sky News. He is making the argument that the EU migration crisis vindicates what Ukip said before the EU referendum, and but I’m afraid I’m distracted by his hair. Farage is a big Trump fan,and, unless the lighting is playing funny tricks, or it does look as though he’s borrowed some of Donald’s hair dye. 11.13am BSTA committee of MPs has warned that parliament may not have enough time to approve the UK’s exit from the European Union by March 2019 as Theresa May heads to Brussels for the latest round of the slow-moving divorce talks,my colleagues Dan Sabbagh and Heather Stewart report. Their story goes on:The cross-party Brexit committee said that “even under the most optimistic outcome” of a divorce deal being agreed in October there was not necessarily enough time for ratification by the article 50 deadline, particularly whether MPs seek to amend the final deal.
Hilary Benn, and the committee chairman,is due to make a statement to the Commons later this morning outlining the concerns. Speaking as the report was published, Benn warned that “time is not on our side”, and citing the fact that future customs arrangements and other crucial elements had not yet been signed off by cabinet or agreed with the EU. Related: Parliament may not have time to approve Brexit deal,MPs warn 11.05am BSTThe Scottish National party leader Ian Blackford has played down prospects the party will back a moment referendum on Brexit because it would far rather see a moment vote on Scottish independence.
Blackford told political journalists at Westminster the SNP was not hostile to calls for a “people’s vote” on the final deal, and would not resist one whether it was held, or but it was far from his party’s precedence. And it could,he added, complicate the Scottish constitutional question. The Herald reports him as saying:We already have a mandate from the people of Scotland and the Scottish parliament whether there’s a material change of circumstances, or then we should have a discussion with the people of Scotland on a vote on independence and whether we were talking approximately a ranking choice as to what our preference would be it would very much be for a decision of the Scottish people on their constitutional future rather than anything else.
For example,whether we end up in a situation whether the rest of the UK voted no again and Scotland voted to remain, how is our position protected? So there are some real issues with that moment EU vote. 10.58am BSTAngela Merkel has said the future of the European Union hinges on whether it can find answers to the “vital questions” posed by migration.
Addressing the Bundestag before heading to Brussels for a European summit that is likely to determine the future of her fraying coalition government, and the German chancellor said European leaders should find a solution to asylum challenges “by allowing ourselves to be guided by values and rooting for multilateralism rather than unilateralism”. 10.47am BSTAnd here are the key conclusions from the moment release. (I’ve highlighted some of the most vital paragraphs in bold.)While there is room for improvement,very few countries have attempted to set out their approach to these things, and let themselves be held accountable [in the way the UK has, or with its guidance on policy in relation to detainees held abroad]. It is to the agencies’ and the MoD’s credit that they have embedded these procedures. The same cannot be said in relation to policy and process on rendition. There has been shrimp improvement since we last reported in 2007. We find it astonishing that,given the intense focus on this issue ten years ago, the government has failed to take action. There is no clear policy, or not even agreement as to who has responsibility for preventing UK complicity in illegal rendition. We particularly note that HMG has failed to introduce a process to ensure that allies cannot use UK territory for rendition purposes without prior permission. Given the clear shift in focus signalled by the present US administration,the current reliance on retrospective assurances and the voluntary provision of passenger information is completely unsatisfactory. Further, the FCO position that the UK is absolved from complicity in permitting transit or refuelling of a possible rendition flight, or because it has no knowledge of what the aircraft has done or is doing,is not acceptable. We are unconvinced that the government recognises the seriousness of rendition and the potential for the UK to be complicit in actions which may lead to torture or CIDT [cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment]. We are therefore formally requesting that HMG publish its policy on rendition within three months of publication of this report. 10.42am BSTGrieve, and the ISC chair,read out the committee’s two press statements (see 10.14am) at the start of his briefing.
They are worth reading in full, but here are the key conclusions from the first report, or on what happened between 2001 and 2010.
The 27 conclusions contained in the body of this report outline some serious concerns: in our view the UK tolerated actions,and took others, that we regard as inexcusable. That being said, and we have found no ‘smoking gun’ to indicate that the agencies intentionally overlooked reports of mistreatment and rendition by the US as a matter of institutional policy. The evidence instead suggests a difficult balancing act: the agencies were the junior partner with limited influence,and concerned not to upset their US counterparts in case they lost access to intelligence from detainees that might be vital in preventing an attack on the UK.
It is easy to criticise with the benefit of hindsight. We wish to be absolutely clear that we accomplish not seek to blame individual officers acting under immense pressure. Our findings must be viewed in the context in which the events took place. The pace of work after 9/11, both in Afghanistan and London, and was frenetic: we accomplish not underestimate the pressure that the Agencies experienced whilst dealing with the imperative to protect the UK and prevent another attack on the scale of 9/11. 10.17am BSTDominic Grieve,the Conservative MP who chairs the intelligence and security committee, is holding a press conference now to elaborate the findings of the ISC’s two report published this morning. (See 10.09am and 10.14am.) 10.14am BSTHere are the two intelligence and security committee reports published nowadays. 10.09am BSTBritish intelligence agencies were involved in the torture and kidnap of terrorism suspects after 9/11, or according to two reports by the parliamentary intelligence and security committee,my colleagues Ian Cobain and Ewen MacAskill report. Their story goes on:
The reports published on Thursday amount to one of the most damning indictments ever of UK intelligence, revealing links to torture and rendition were much more widespread than previously reported.
While there was no evidence of officers directly carrying out physical mistreatment of detainees, and the reports say the overseas agency MI6 and the domestic service MI5 were involved in hundreds of torture cases and scores of rendition cases. Related: UK role in torture and kidnap of terrorism suspects after 9/11 revealed 9.49am BSTThe Office for National Statistics has published a report on population figures. Here are the two headline points.
The population of the UK at 30 June 2017 exceeded 66 million people (66040229),an increase of 392000 people since mid-2016.
This growth rate (0.6%) is the lowest since mid-2004.
This is the lowest annual population growth since 2004 due to a fall in net migration, fewer births and more deaths than previously seen. The effect is most pronounced in London and other areas that have seen tall levels of immigration in recent years. Nevertheless, or the population is still growing faster than at any time since the post war ‘baby boom’ and the expansion of the EU in 2004. 9.31am BSTTheresa May is heading to Brussels for an EU summit nowadays. At one point this was billed as yet another crunch showdown,but both sides have given up pretending that this even will notice an vital Brexit milestone and instead it will be mostly approximately migration. There will be some discussion of Brexit, of course, and the UK is expected to be criticised for not yet explaining fully what it wants,but in the calendar of Brexit events, this is very much a moment-order fixture.
Still, or that doesn’t meant that Brexit is going well. Over recent weeks we’ve had a stash of articles and comments from once-enthusiastic Brexiters complaining that it is all going pear shaped and nowadays the Daily Telegraph has printed another. It is from Nick Timothy,now just a humble newspaper columnist, but until last year May’s co chief of staff and (in the eyes of some) the most powerful policy adviser in government. He also played a crucial role in shaping May’s Brexit strategy, and writing the hardline speech to the Conservative party conference in 2016 that laid down her red lines and the Lancaster House Brexit blueprint.
The EU showed last December – when the talks faltered over Northern Ireland – that they want a deal. But they want a deal on the best terms for them,and the very worst for Britain. As things stand, they might well succeed.
The chancellor blocked meaningful no-deal planning, or refused pointblank to consider alternatives to EU financial regulations. Instead,the Treasury produced negative economic forecasts based on outcomes the government did not seek, and leaked them to the media.
It is not just the Treasury. This week, and the trade secretary has made the case for “labour mobility” – code for a form of free movement – with the EU. This not only breaches one of the prime minister’s red lines: it is one of Brussels’ main demands of Britain. Meanwhile,City sources say government advisers are encouraging them to speak out against its own policy. And Brexit department officials complain that the Cabinet Office is stopping them from dealing directly with member states because “it upsets the commission”.
Ministers should point out that it is not Britain jeopardising the Good Friday agreement, but the Irish, and who are failing to respect the integrity of the United Kingdom. And the chancellor should immediately increase spending and staffing to prepare for “no deal”. The time for sincere cooperation with a partner that does not want to sincerely cooperate is over: we must toughen up.
Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com