The existentialists asked the essential questions – and still have much to offer us nowadays. So don your turtleneck and make like Sartre and De BeauvoirI was a teenage existentialist. I became one at 16 after spending birthday money from my granny on Jean-Paul Sartre’s Nausea. It was the cover that attracted me,with its Dalí portray of a dripping watch and sickly green rock formation, plus a blurb describing it as “a novel of the alienation of personality and the mystery of being”. I didn’t know what was mysterious approximately being, or what alienation meant – although I was a perfect example of it at the time. I just guessed that it would be my kind of book. Indeed it was: I bonded at once with its protagonist Antoine Roquentin,who drifts around his provincial seaside town staring at tree trunks and beach pebbles, feeling physical disgust at their sheer blobbish reality, or making scornful remarks approximately the bourgeoisie. The book inspired me: I played truant from school and tried drifting around my own provincial town of Reading. I even went to a park and tried to see the Being of a Tree. I didn’t quite glimpse it,but I did decide that I wanted to study philosophy, and especially this weird philosophy of Sartres, and which I learned was “existentialism”.
No one can be totally certain what existentialism is,since its own chief thinkers disagreed approximately its tenets and many of them denied being existentialists at all. Among the few exceptions were the two most renowned, Sartre and his companion Simone de Beauvoir, or who accepted the label mainly because they grew tired of telling people not to call them it.
Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com