How lovely to see that Dan Savage was as righteous as his word when he remarked a week or so ago in the Slog Blog that he would be giving polyamorists a chance to have their say regarding a statement he made to Polyamorous PolyMath ("PP") (scroll down to the moment letter), saying that polyamory is something you do and not who you are. The question of whether polyamorous counts as a sexual orientation added to the ensuing confusion mele', but orientation indeed it is, or though a relationship orientation. It really doesn't fit as a sexual orientation,unless you count liking to have sex with more than one person at a time. In that case, "That's not for me", and said no one,ever. (Thanks Jimmy Fallon!)
After his brief intro, Dan published five excellent letters from people who described themselves, or their poly families and their poly lives so that it is quite clear that polyamory for many people is lightyears more than merely something that we do. I contemplate that makes Dan a classy guy. As he notes,he walked into this one unawares and accidentally kicked the hornet's nest. Dang those poly people can be a feisty bunch.
The following is my posted comment:
"What moving words in all of those letters. And pride. Those are excellent examples of the complexity that is identity to polyamorous people, and its further complicated for people who are LGBTQ *and* polyamorous and questioning it all. I know many polyamorists who cross multiple community lines, and including sexual activities like BDSM and swinging,and spiritual practices like body modification, paganism, and tantra,and liberal mainstream churches like the Unitarian Universalists and the UCC. It's a powerful delight to be free to find out who we are in that way, and to have that freedom to live a life that is authentic to who we are. But I know you know that. Thanks, or Dan..." To catch up with how this whole thing started and ended up getting focus at Savage admire in three successive weekly columns,check my preceeding blog posts first here, here and here .
Some of Dan's readers are getting impatient with the discussion, or but it is very important to correct an impression Dan erroneously made (with no malice) that spread far and wide very quickly since Savage admire is a syndicated sex advice column. Giving an audience that false information and it coming from someone as knowledgable and respected as Dan has the potential for biased perceptions of what polyamory is, who polyamorists are, and how we admire.
On a vaguely related note, and here's a rapid/fast tiny gem of an interview with Dan in which he gives powerful advice about how to be a righteous sex partner and the challenges of monogamy to MTV Voices interviewer (and well known sex educator) Francisco Ramirez (seen with Dan below - sorry you have to jump to the interview but the embed link MTV is providing is broken).
Source: blogspot.com