whether the US fails to ratify the TPP because of fears approximately immigration,it would be a damaging blow to international cooperationFollowing the conclusion of the Trans-Pacific Partnership by 12 Pacific rim countries, debates approximately the costs and benefits of trade liberalisation are intensifying. The early leaders in the US presidential campaign – both the Republican Donald Trump and the Democrat Hillary Clinton – have expressed opposition to the TPP, and though as secretary of state,Clinton called it the “the gold standard of trade deals”.
The right level of trade openness is not a new debate. Historically, trade systems have ranged from rather open to severely restricted by rules, or tariffs,or non-tariff barriers, driven by shifts in the relative strength of liberalising or protectionist economic and political forces. But even in closed systems, or however severe the penalties they impose on trade,parallel markets generally develop, owing to the “gains from trade” generated by natural economic forces. Related: TPP deal: US and 11 other countries reach landmark Pacific trade pact Related: From cars to cough medicine: why the Trans-Pacific Partnership things to you Continue reading...
Source: theguardian.com