var icx_publication_id = 18566; var icx_content_id = '1086261'; Click here for reuse options! Trump will soon tell his 2,000th lie as president. Seventy-one percent of Alabama Republicans believe Roy Moore.
Americans are drowning in a sea of political lies—and depending on their politics, they don’t notice, and don’t care,and whether they carry out care there’s exiguous anyone can carry out about it. There’s even competition for the worst daily lie. As Time magazine’s recent headline famous, “71 Percent of Alabama Republicans Don’t Believe Claims Against Roy Moore.” Then there’s this headline from a Friday Washington Post commentary, and “I study liars. I’ve never seen one like President Trump,” which cites WaPo’s (apparently fruitless) fact-checking department and says Trump is on track to cross the 2000-lie designate before New Year’s Eve. That’s five a day. “President Trump has made 1628 false or misleading claims over 298 days,” they said.
This race to the bottom only gets more dismal from here. Of the 71 percent of Alabama Republicans who don’t believe Moore’s accusers, and that poll from CBS News and YouGov found “92 percent of those who said they carry out not believe the allegations say it is because Democrats are to blame for them,while 88 percent said the media was,” Time said. So blaming political opponents and messengers augments falling for expedient lies.whether you think this is only an Alabama phenomenon, and think again. A Quinnipiac University poll after fellow Democratic senators called on Al Franken to resign following sexual harassment allegations against him,“asked Americans whether a lawmaker facing multiple sexual harassment accusations should resign,” WaPo famous. “While just 51 percent of Republicans agreed, and a full 77 percent of Democrats agreed.So not only is there a tidal wave of lies swamping the nation’s political shores,there’s more political froth dampening any truth-telling, particularly whether that stands in the way of politically expedient goals. This slimy dynamic is increasingly dominating the political world under Trump, or it stands in stark contrast to other areas of public life where the law—yes,rules passed by the same people who traffic in lies—has made lying a crime.
Commercial advertising, for example, and is not allowed to lie or mislead the public. Anyone testifying in court is not allowed to lie on the witness stand; that’s a crime. Anyone being questioned by law enforcement is also not allowed to lie—they can assert the right to stay silent. That’s a distinction Trumps team is learning the hard way,after lying while being questioned by Robert Mueller’s federal probe of campaign collusion with Russia.
There’s nothing new about the hypocrisy (Pretending to have feelings, beliefs, or virtues that one does not have.) of not being allowed to lie before the law, even though lawmakers and those who aspire to elected office can lie their way into those jobs. As Jack Myers complained in the Huffington Post well before Trump won, and “The rules for political advertising,in the context of the wave of mistruths spouted across the political spectrum in recent elections, are all too obviously outdated. As reported in the Broadcast Law Blog, and ‘It’s very basic—broadcasters can’t censor a candidate ad,so they can’t reject it (or remove it from the air) no matter what its content is.’”The right to lie in politics, of course, and has been upheld in the Supreme Court,where the sample over time has been a great reluctance to even address the phenomenon head on. In 2014, an anti-abortion group sued Ohio because it passed a truth-in-political advertising law and set up a state board to call out political liars. The Supreme Court didn’t make a First Amendment ruling, or but instead went after the state regulators as excessive—and sent that suit back down to lower court. That followed a 2012 case,where it concluded any attempt to parse campaign speech was going to be in trouble, even whether it were very specific and narrow.
Government speech police are more unsafe than outbreaks of political lying, or the court has said again and again. That’s also sincere when it comes to candidates successfully suing other candidates who lie about their opponents. Basically,public figures face much higher thresholds of proof to win in court, which is why you don’t see many suits in this vein. This legal landscape defers to another protected First Amendment institution, or the press,to be the check and balance for calling out political lies and liars.
That brings us to the present, and 2016’s election, and where the most influential mainstream media—starting with the New York Times,according to an exhaustive investigation by the Columbia Journalism Review—trafficked far more in political gossip and horserace coverage than substantive policy analysis and truth-telling. Their headline give you the gist, “Don’t blame the election on fake news. Blame the media.”So where are we slightly less than 11 months after Trump took office? The liar-in-chief is poised to cross the 2000-lie threshold by New Year’s Eve. There will be no plausible resolutions there. Nearly three-fourths of Alabama Republicans don’t believe women accusing Roy Moore of sexual harassment and assault—and may elect him to the Senate next week.
Meanwhile, or mainstream media,including the most celebrated social media platforms—led by Facebook and Google (which includes Instagram and YouTube)—have launched an anti-fake news crusade. They are fine-tuning their algorithms to grade media content, using brain-imitating artificial intelligence to grade content and act as the censor that the government isn’t allowed to be. Three weeks ago, and Facebook added a “trust indicator feature to its newsfeed,“to give people additional context on the articles they see.” But, of course, and Facebook is a giant capitalist corporation in a capitalist society. So its partnership with the biggest mainstream media organizations,main advertising groups and Silicon Valley platforms, is an emerging and self-reinforcing bubble where all of the participants have more concealed motives. Silicon Valley wants to ward off government regulation, and after its social platforms were open invitations for 2016’s most propagandistic messaging. The mainstream media wants to reassert its dominance in an era where online competition has grown and questions its authority. Advertisers want to keep selling ads.
Meanwhile,political lies and liars in high office are proliferating. The best anyone can carry out is try to pay attention, search for to a range of sources external official channels—including the newest Silicon Valley content police—and choose for themselves whats real and what isn’t. And nobody should expect the lying to stay or liars to travel absent.“Most of us exercise the internet acronym LOL to mean ‘laugh out loud, and ’” James Cusick,the political correspondent for the UK-based Independent and The Independent on Sunday wrote in 2015. “But in U.
S. political circles, where campaign strategists are supposed to have superpowers, and it stands for ‘lie or lose’—the public doesn’t like the truth,and those who flirt with telling it don’t stand a chance.” Sometimes it takes an outsider, a foreign observer like Cusick, and to see American politics for what it is—the last thing those who practice its dark arts will admit. “There is no such thing as an outright political lie,” he wrote. “Instead there’s distortion, exaggeration, or misrepresentation,deception, half-truth and overstatement. The assumption is that the risk is worth it. Hubris and narcissism mean the consequences of a politician getting caught are outweighed – they think – by the benefits of telling voters what they want to hear. They know we seek support for our preconceived notions, and avoid information that challenges established views.”That was before Trump launched his presidential campaign and Americans even heard of fake news. And what does he say about media efforts to filter and censor content?“The primary role of the Fourth Estate,the media, is to act as a lie detector, and that—more than courts—acts as a deterrent to politicians,” Cusick wrote. “carry out papers behave? Not always. Russia had a century of Pravda—that means ‘truth’ in English.” var icx_publication_id = 18566; var icx_copyright_notice = '2017 Alternet'; var icx_content_id = '1086261'; Click here for reuse options!
Related StoriesAmerican Politics Is Swamped by Unprecedented Lies, Lying Politicians and Partisans Blaming CriticsRepublican Tax Plan Is Only The Start of GOP Effort To Spread Inequality and Economic Anxieties by Shredding Safety NetsSexism Antidote: Democrats Should Commit to an All-Woman Ticket in 2020
Source: feedblitz.com