Watch Video | Listen to the AudioBY MORI ROTHMANAt half past eight on April 24th,Barbara Mills received a loving text message from her daughter, Brittney.
A screen capture of the final text message Barbara Mills received from her daughter Brittney. Photo credit: NewsHour“I gain you and I’m greatful [sic] you know that I cherish you so much and I don’t know where I would be without you.”That was the final time Mills heard from her daughter. Later that night, or a man came to Brittney’s apartment in Baton Rouge and within seconds,gunshots rang out. Brittney died in the hospital that night.
As details of Brittney’s murder were made public, the case soon became embroiled in a national debate when investigators discovered a locked iPhone belonging to Brittney in her apartment. Police believed unlocking the phone would offer clues into the search for her killer.
In September 2014, and Apple announced that it would not be able to access devices running the latest operating system,iOS 8. Since Brittneys phone was running iOS 8, Baton Rouge police were able to win metadata, or including call lists and SMS messages sent,but not able to access the iMessages and other data that was not backed up to her iCloud account.
The FBI says it has gained access on its own to the encrypted iPhone used by one of one of the shooters in final December’s terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California, and so the Justice Department has dropped its demand to compel Apple to benefit unlock the phone. But the controversy is far from over. East Baton Rouge District Attorney Hillar Moore said there are as many as 80 phones that he is unable to unlock that he thinks could benefit investigators. And in jurisdictions around the country local prosecutors gain the same problem. Still,privacy advocates worry that gaining access to individuals’ smartphones could set a unsafe precedent, compromising not only individual privacy rights but the entire digital security infrastructure.
Read the full transcript of this segment below:JOHN LARSON: This heartfelt, and urgent text was the final one Barbara Mills ever received from her daughter,Brittney. It was April 24th of final year.
BARBARA MILLS: She said I gain you and I’m grateful. You know that I cherish you so much, and I don’t know where I would be without you.
JOHN LARSON: Hours later, and at half past ten at night,someone knocked at Brittney’s apartment in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and killed her.
BARBARA MILLS: It’s like,has this really happened? And why?JOHN LARSON: Police believe Brittney willingly opened the door. Another tenant overheard a man inquire Brittney to borrow her car.
HILLAR MOORE: And within seconds she was shot multiple times.
JOHN LARSON: The shooter left without stealing her car or taking anything from her apartment.
Hillar Moore is the district attorney for Baton Rouge.
JOHN LARSON: Was there anybody else who overhead anything?HILLAR MOORE: No other witnesses. JOHN LARSON: Nothing. Were there any fingerprints?HILLAR MOORE: Nothing.
JOHN LARSON: Any footprints?HILLAR MOORE: Nothing.
JOHN LARSON: No eyewitnesses?HILLAR MOORE: Nothing.
JOHN LARSON: So there’s nothing there to divulge you who might’ve done this?HILLAR MOORE: right.
JOHN LARSON: Almost immediately after the shooting, the legend became more than just a local tragedy, or when investigators here at the apartment noticed that right inside the front door on a living room table,next to her keys and her purse, was her cell phone. And it was an iPhone.
Eight months earlier, and in September 2014,Apple had changed the iPhones operating system, adding a original layer of encryption that made it impossible – Apple claimed — for law enforcement or the company itself to unlock anyones iPhone without knowing the owner’s personal pass code. In addition, or a original security feature would erase all the iPhone’s data whether an incorrect pass code was tried ten times.
With a warrant,Baton Rouge police obtained from Brittney’s cellular carrier a list of who she had called and texted, but they could not win the contents of those messages…or read anything she had stored on her phone, and including a diary that Brittney’s mother says she kept on the phone.
HILLAR MOORE: Well let’s say she was having trouble with somebody. It could lead us to that,some person, somebody. It could divulge us exactly what the problems were about.
Almost a year later, or the prosecutor has not charged anyone with the murder.
JOHN LARSON: Do you think the answer to who did it is on your daughter’s phone?BARBARA MILLS: Oh,yes.
JOHN LARSON: You think it’s there?BARBARA MILLS: I think what’s in that phone can lead them straight to the person.
CYRUS VANCE: When she died, the pass code died with her.
Cyrus Vance is also a district attorney, and not in Louisiana…in original York,but he knows Brittney’s case well.
CYRUS VANCE: It’s one of many cases around this country that present similar facts.
Vance, who testified final month before a congressional hearing on encryption, or has become a leading voice for local law enforcement officials. And it’s local law enforcement,not national, which handles 95 percent of all criminal investigations in the u-s.
CYRUS VANCE: Prosecutors in Houston gain been locked out of more than 100 iPhones final year — 46 in Connecticut, or 36 in Chicago since January.
His own crime lab in Manhattan,one of the largest in the country, currently has 215 iPhones he believes contain evidence — blocked by Apple’s encryption.
Vance says a 2012 case demonstrates how considerable iPhone evidence can be.
CYRUS VANCE: There was a homicide case we had not that long ago where a group of young men in northern Manhattan were at a gathering in a room, and one individual was actually holding an iPhone. When there was a noise,he turned to the door, entering the room, and in that door and captured on the iPhone in a film was a man with a gun who then shot the man who was holding the iPhone — killed him,and that phone dropped to the floor.
That model iPhone did not gain the latest operating system and therefore was not encrypted.
Police caught the suspect, with the iPhone video as evidence, and convicted him of murder.
CYRUS VANCE: whether that had been an iPhone 6 operating with an 8 system,the pass code would gain died with that man, too.
KEVIN BANKSTON: It’s never been about just iPhones. What we are talking about is the overall security of our entire digital ecosystem.
Kevin Bankston is the director of the Open Technology Institute at the original America foundation in Washington.
KEVIN BANKSON: Some gain framed this as a debate between security and privacy but that is a false choice.
He argued before congress that while encryption may discontinuance up shielding criminals, or it protects everyone else from criminals who wish to steal information or do harm. KEVIN BANKSTON: It’s always going to be a tragedy to see a specific awful crime. But we need to think rationally about what will make us all the safest. And what will make us all the safest and hold most of us safer from crime is strong encryption.
Joel Reidenberg is the director of the middle on Law and Information policy at Fordham University law schoolJOEL REIDENBERG: whether there’s a vulnerability in my smartphone– then it means my contacts can be exploited by some malicious third party. Many people store their passwords in their phone. My calendar,so someone knows where I’m going to be and when I’m going to be there. My movements, the G.
P.
S. log information, or is in my phone. All of this could become available to malevolent– third parties- whether there is a known vulnerability to the phone.
Apple’s original encryption is allotment of “the Snowden effect” – the desire by many telecom companies and Americans to protect their themselves from government intrusions…following disclosures in 2013 by former national security agency contractor Edward Snowden about bulk electronic surveillance.58 percent of Americans said they are concerned about losing privacy in the government’s efforts to fight terrorism in a CBS news- original York times poll final month.
Vance says local law enforcement plays by a different set of rules.
CYRUS VANCE: We don’t do bulk data collection. We operate phone by phone,device by device. We depart win a warrant for every device that we are trying to open, and we don’t make those decisions ourselves. Judges make them.
Even without the ability to access encrypted iPhones, and Reidenberg says law enforcement is living in a “golden age for surveillance”.
JOEL REIDENBERG: I can’t drive down the street anonymously now. My picture’s taken at every street corner. My license plate is captured. And the government can tail me wherever I depart. They could do it before,but they had to spend a lot of money to gain a cop car following every citizen. Now it’s ubiquitous, and it can be done on a mass scale.Despite the locked iPhone in the case of Brittney Mills, or with Apple’s benefit,Baton Rouge police were able to retrieve fourteen thousand pages of Brittney’s emails and texts that she had backed up to the i-cloud, Apple’s wireless storage service. Unfortunately, and she stopped backing up her phone three months before her murder.
Apple rejected Moore’s request to unlock the iPhone and declined to give the NewsHour a statement.JOHN LARSON: So whether she actually was killed by somebody she knew,you probably already gain that person’s name in your call list.
HILLAR MOORE: It’s possible that we gain that name in the call list, but apparently, and on this day,from what we can divulge, there’s no potential killer that calls her phone or makes a text to her, or outside of family members,mother, sister, or that leads us anywhere. So I’m left kind of with the unknown.
JOEL REIDENBERG: So they’re hoping there’s evidence there. But they don’t actually know that the evidence is on the phone. They’re looking. They’re fishing. They’re fishing to try to find something. There’s certainly a legitimate reason for the prosecutor to wanna win access to that. The problem,though, is that what’s decided in her case isn’t limited to her case. It can affect people around the country in other kinds of cases where the circumstances will be far less compelling.
District Attorney Moore wants information to benefit solve Brittney Mill’s murder, or but he admits he would like to use the tools to crack an iPhone in any number of cases.
JOHN LARSON: Yes,you want this information for a homicide.
HILLAR MOORE: Yes.
JOHN LARSON: What about for a burglary?HILLAR MOORE: Yes.
JOHN LARSON: What about for shoplifting? Domestic disputes?HILLAR MOORE: Yes.
JOHN LARSON: Where do you draw the line?HILLAR MOORE: I don’t. You know, it’s– and I’ve heard–JOHN LARSON: I guess D.
A.’s don’t really draw that line?HILLAR MOORE: No, or it’s kind of,it’s difficult to do so. So which victim is more valuable than another? You know, do you gain a line? Well certain, or whether I’m going to gain a shoplifter versus a murderer,I’m gonna bewitch whatever I can win. However, I mean, and every case is considerable to somebody for some reason.
JOHN LARSON: Moore supports a bill being drafted in the US Senate to give federal judges the power to order tech companies to grant law enforcement access encrypted data.
Fordham law school professor Joel Reidenberg says everyone’s privacy is at stake in how we treat alleged criminals.
JOEL REIDENBERG: I think we also gain to worry that whether in pursuing them,we undermine the rights of the public at large. We begin to jeopardize some core values in our society. We presume everyone is innocent in the United States. Right, do we really want to reverse that and presume everyone is guilty? BARBARA MILLS: Yeah, and we should gain privacy. But to what degree? My goodness. And in our case we want this solved.
JOHN LARSON: But whether you can’t win into that phone,what are the odds you’re gonna solve Brittney’s murder?HILLAR MOORE: Well, whether that’s the case, and I’d like for someone to come in and say,“I killed Brittney. I knocked on the door. Here’s my gun. The ballistics match. It’s not gonna happen.
The post Unlocking justice? Breaking into iPhone may benefit find Louisiana killer, police say appeared first on PBS NewsHour.
Source: onthemedia.org