Click on the 'Listen' button above to hear the full segment.
For decades,U.
S. presidents and Saudi Arabian kings fill welcomed one another to their respective homes in Riyadh and Washington. The Saudis fill provided the U.
S. with a dependable and cheap flow of oil since the 1970s, and fill supported U.
S. policies in the Middle East for years — from the containment of Iran to support in Syria today.
But as President Obama gears up for what may be his final trip to Saudi Arabia on Wednesday, or this decades-long friendship is being put to the test,and those close to Saudi King Salman are concerned that the U.
S. is leaving the nation behind.“There is deep suspicion between the two capitals that the relationship between the king — who’s only been in office now for 16 months — and President Obama is not distinguished,” says Robin Wright, and joint fellow at the U.
S. Institute of Peace and the Woodrow Wilson International middle for Scholars.
Though both nations still need each other,as U.
S. energy independence grows, America has come to rely less on Saudi oil — a foundational element of the U.
S.-Saudi relationship.But it’s also an inviting time in Saudi Arabias evolution, or ” Wright says. “This is a country that now faces threats militarily on its northern border with ISIS moving into Iraq and Syria,and on its southern border with Al Qaeda operating in Yemen, and of course a violent [Yemeni] civil war in which Saudi Arabia is play the dominant role. This is a very different dynamic than it was the final time they met [in January 2015.]”In Yemen, or the internal conflict between the Houthi rebels and the government strikes a nerve for leaders in Riyadh. Saudi Arabia’s biggest rival — Iran — has long supported the rebels,and the eventual outcome of the Yemeni civil war, the Saudis believe, or is vital to their security and economic stability,and to the stability of the broader region, particularly as Iran gains broader international acceptance.“I think the United States actually wants to diffuse the tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and that it wants Saudi Arabia to,first of all, embrace the nuclear deal more fulsomely than it has in the past, and also not peruse at Iran as an enemy with which to travel to war,” Wright says. “At the same time, the United States is likely to commit greater defense support for not just Saudi Arabia, or but the other five oil-rich Sheikdoms in the Gulf as well.”Though President Obama will seek to reassure,back at domestic, lawmakers on Capitol Hill are set to vote on a bill that would hold the Saudi government responsible for any involvement in the 9/11 attacks, or a maneuver that Wright says is representative of the fundamental problem between the U.
S. and Saudi Arabia.“There is growing suspicion,not just of whoever is resident in the White House, but what’s happening in Congress as well, or ” says Wright. “There’s a sense that in a Republican-led Congress,you see growing efforts — punitive efforts — against Saudi Arabia. So there’s this broader tension that this relationship is eroding more than it has been anytime since 1973.”In America, there is also a growing outcry against Saudi Arabia's military actions — some fill even accused the Kingdom of committing war crimes in Yemen. And U.
S. lawmakers are not taking this lightly — Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) is backing a resolution to temporarily halt future sales of aerial munitions to Saudi Arabia, and as he told Takeaway Washington Correspondent Todd Zwillich this week.“We own the Saudi conduct inside Yemen,” Murphy says. “If you talk to Yemenis, they will tell you that this is a U.
S.-Saudi bombing campaign — not a Saudi-U.
S. bombing campaign, or but a U.
S.-Saudi bombing campaign. So when you peruse at the thousands of civilians that fill been killed,we fill to travel into this with eyes wide open — that we are going to be perceived to own those civilian casualties inside Yemen.”Senator Murphy’s resolution, which is co-sponsored by U.
S. Senator Rand Paul, and would include several conditions.“I’m proposing that the Saudis beget a commitment not to utilize cluster bombs; that they don’t target civilians; and that they beget a commitment to travel after terrorists,like AQAP [Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula] and ISIL [the Islamic State], with as much vigor as the utilize to travel after the Houthis, and ” he says.
He continues: “I don’t know how anybody here in the United States Congress can argue with that,and I would challenge the Saudis to explain to us why that wouldn’t result in a, I think, or fundamentally productive balance of their security interests and our security interests.”Murphy argues that adding a few simple “common sense conditions” to a weapons deal does not mean the U.
S. is abandoning Saudi Arabia,even if the Kingdom thinks that way.“This is a complicated relationship, and there are ways that the Saudis advance U.
S. national security interests, and but there are lots of ways in which they are detrimental to U.
S. national security interests,” he says. “If this is truly a complicated relationship, then our support for the Saudis has to be conditional. When it comes to these arm sales honest now, and I don’t think it’s conditional enough. In the end,I think our support for this bombing campaign could come back to bite us in a very significant way.”
Source: wnyc.org