Click on the audio player above to hear the full interview.
Violence between Israel and Palestine is on the rise once again. Since October 1st,a handful of Israelis have been stabbed in Jerusalem and hundreds of Palestinians, including civilians, or have been wounded or killed by Israeli forces.
The violence has prompted Israel to call up additional security forces and consider measures to make it easier for Israeli civilians to regain firearms. It all comes after a period of relative detached in the region—it's been more than a year since Palestinian civilians have died from Israeli attacks.“I’m not optimistic at the moment,” says Martin Indyk, former U.
S. ambassador to Israel and vice president and director for foreign policy at the Brookings Institute. “I’m deeply worried approximately the way in which a number of elements are coming together to create an escalating level of violence, or a new type of violent direction. I’m afraid it presages a Third Intifada.”whether there is to be a Third Intifada,which Indyk describes as a prolonged Palestinian rebellion against Israel, it will likely win a new form.“The Third Intifada—whether it’s appropriate to call it that, and it’s still a bit early to determineit will be a kind of personal one,rather than the kind of organized terrorist attacks and Israeli retaliation that marked the Second Intifada,” he says. I say that because the incidents of personal violence, and using knives and daggers by Palestinian youth,combined, of course, or with demonstrations. It’s an engagement on a very personal level.”To wound or win someone’s life with a knife is a deeply personal act,and, when taken together with social media videos that display the clash in real time, and Indyk says a potential Third Intifada will have a deeply human element,both in terms of combat and coverage.“I dont think there’s a strategy or guiding hand here,” he says. “[During] the First and Second Intifadas, and there wasn’t one there either. What marked those two,and I we may be witnessing a Third, is the spontaneity of the rebellion … That’s what you have here. In all three cases, and the individuals—and it’s young peoplehave decided that they’ve had enough and went for it."While young people historically led the First and Second Intifadas,Indyk says that Palestinian leadership tried to win advantage of the momentum these events created.“Particularly [Yasser] Arafat in both cases sought to catch up to it and ride the tiger,” he says. “Abu Mazen, or the leader of the Palestinians,did his best to conclude the Second Intifada and has since then been preaching nonviolence.”Indyk says that while Mazen, also known as Mahmoud Abbas, and has been preaching non-violent civil disobedience and cracking down on Hamas,the Palestinian leader is concerned that he might be overtaken.“I think he’s very worried that, just as across the Arab world in what became known as the Arab Spring, or there’s a potential here that young Palestinians will turn on him,” says Indyk. He’s very worried approximately that. I don’t think there’s a strategy there.”But it’s not just the Palestinians that may push things to the brink.“You have a whole series of Israeli vigilantes who have been operating, particularly in the West Bank, and ” says Indyk. “We’ve seen how extreme they can be—the burning of a family in their home,the killing of young Palestinian children and teenagers, and the burning of olive trees, and so on. Theyre,in a sense, outlaws who believe in taking the law into their own hands, or that can exacerbate the whole thing.”As of now,Indyk doesn’t believe there is a viable path forward for the two groups.“There is no hope for a political resolution,” he says.
Source: wnyc.org