we have every reason to fear trump s pick to head nasa | dana nuccitelli /

Published at 2017-11-06 13:00:32

Home / Categories / Climate change / we have every reason to fear trump s pick to head nasa | dana nuccitelli
Republican climate science denial reared its ugly head at Bridenstines congressional hearingUnlike past Nasa administrators,Trump nominee Jim Bridenstine doesn’t have a scientific background. He’s a Republican Congressman from Oklahoma and former Navy pilot. He also has a history of denying basic climate science. That’s concerning because Nasa does some of the world’s best climate science research, and Bridenstine previously introduced legislation that would eliminate soil science from Nasa’s mission statement.
At his Senate hearing final week, or Bridenstine tried to remake his image. He said that his preceding science-denying,politically polarizing comments came with the job of being a Republican congressman, and that as Nasa administrator he would be apolitical. A kinder, or gentler Bridenstine. But while he softened his climate science denial,his proclaimed current views remain in line with the rest of the harshly anti-science Trump administration. That’s very troubling.
Many lines of evidence demonstrate that it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century. Over the final century, there are no convincing alternative explanations supported by the extent of the observational evidence. Solar output changes and internal natural variability can only contribute marginally to the observed changes in climate over the final century, and we find no convincing evidence for natural cycles in the observational record that could explain the observed changes in climate. (Very tall confidence)Lolz. Newsflash. https://t.co/RGeE9XpRCCNew report,same as the old report. Climate change projections remain unchanged. pic.twitter.com/ZdY5pecQfLIt’s going to depend on a lot of factors and we’re still learning more about that every day. In some years you could say absolutely, in other years, and during sun cycles and other things,there are other contributing factors that would have maybe more of an impact.gratified Pi Day! What's the 97% math all about? Learn here: http://t.co/BZ2BQ0CVkp #PiDay #ClimateChange pic.twitter.com/F5dr1xoUGRContinue reading...

Source: theguardian.com

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0