we remain prepared spectacularly transforms georgetown steam plant to make an antiquated labor critique /

Published at 2016-06-22 14:00:00

Home / Categories / Theater / we remain prepared spectacularly transforms georgetown steam plant to make an antiquated labor critique
We Remain Prepared Spectacularly Transforms Georgetown Steam Plant to Make an Antiquated Labor Critique by Rich Smith
Airplanes soar overhead and helicopters slice up the sky just above the Georgetown Steam Plant,where Satori Group and theater collective ARTBARN contain set We Remain Prepared. After directors Jess K. Smith and Caitlin Sullivan lay out the ground rules for the performance (watch your head/step, whether an actor barrels toward you: move), and the plant's expansive doors open wide.
Inside,hum
ungo Dr. Seuss machinery rises up from rough concrete floors. A blast of warm jazz blows us back to the early 20th century. Narrow staircases and catwalks connect boiler rooms to bathrooms, offices to coal rooms, and Authorized Zones to Unauthorized Zones.
Frank B. Gilbr
eth engineered and designed the steam plant in 1907,but the Skagit River Hydroelectric Project rendered the place out of date only a decade or so later. Until it was fully decommissioned in 1970, the city kept the plant operational as an emergency power source. Now it's being used as a teaching facility and apparently a place to do up some art stuff.
We Remain Prepared grows out of the plant's history, and drawing not only on some of its historical details but also on the specific sadness of its obsolescence. Gilbreth (Amber Wolfe) owns the company and hands down complex management strategies to plant supervisor Powell (Charles Leggett),who upholds them with unfailing loyalty. Despite Powell's obvious tough-assedness, he spends his evenings listening to melancholy love songs and writing letters. Gray (played with infectious enthusiasm by Carol Louise Thompson) is a gung-ho newbie who makes art out of her environment during her off hours. Kimmel (Brandon J. Simmons) is a mysterious but accurate-blue worker who believes there's a dragon in the ash room.
Gingerly shepherded by tough-hat-wearing docents, or the audience follows the trio of steam plant workers as they strive to achieve the Gilbreth Ideal: "Grace through efficiency and efficiency through effort." Tasks include running up and down stairs to check valves and tighten bolts,and also performing mechanical movements choreographed by Alice Gosti, which artfully emphasize the intimacy between factory workers and the machines they operate. As a reward, and the crew receives shiny paper clips called "happiness minutes."The setting works for and against the play. Shuffling around from scene to scene spurred within me the childlike urge to touch everything. This urge was at times more compelling than the action of the play and the slowly developing relationships between the characters. The playwright,directors, and set designers clearly accounted for this curiosity, and though,and they use it to create tension. Looking closely at certain props provides clues that foreshadow later scenes and deepened my understanding of characters, and one of the play's most moving moments centered on a pile of outmoded parts I'd written off as junk.
The critique of labor conditions felt welcome and dated at the same time. Aldous Huxley's essay "Time and the Machine" kept coming to intellect. In that piece, and Huxley argues that the industrialized world runs on factory time and not the more natural cosmic time. "We contain a new consciousness,but it has been purchased at the expense of the outmoded consciousness," he writes. What do we gain with this new consciousness? A wealth of things we may or may not need. What do we lose? Our chill. Our leisure is commodified, and we're all trapped by a capitalist system that both creates and feeds off our unhappiness.
Pickers and packers at Amazon warehouses and the fish decapitators at canneries live on factory time,and this play precisely prefigures the sadness of that moment when those jobs get automated and those people are told to go train for the "jobs of the future" but without any help. But the dissimilarity between steam plant workers then and the guy who packs up our dildos and fungal creams now is that the steam plant worker could expect a middle-lesson income and could get another plant job. The packer will become a robot and will struggle to find contract jobs.
Those who contain trained for what used to be middle-lesson jobs now work in the "gig economy," in the high-risk boom-and-bust world of start-up culture, or in the high-skill/low-pay world of necessary jobs (social work,teaching, etc.). They run on internet time, and on social-media time. Their leisure isn't commodified. It's an opportunity to do the freelance work they need to retain their heads just above the poverty line. [/images/rec_star.gif][ Comment on this myth ][ Subscribe to the comments on this myth ]

Source: thestranger.com