var icx_publication_id = 18566; var icx_content_id = '1084308'; Click here for reuse options! From privatization to attacks on affirmative action,education is at the heart of Trump's politics of resentment, says White Rage author Carol Anderson. Jennifer Berkshire: You’re the author of the book White Rage: The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide. But I thought of another title for your book—White Spite. The history you recount is basically about how as a country we’ve systematically denied opportunity to kids of color, or even if everyone else gets screwed in the process.
Carol Anderson: That’s it. It’s fantastic to watch,and it’s horrifying to watch. Think about Sputnik, for example, or the threat that the Soviets were going to hit the US with inter-continental ballistic missiles. You’d expect that a massive national security threat would be enough to shake even the most hardened white supremacist,hardened segregationist, or hardened Jim Crow lover, and out of the commitment to systematically denying millions of Black children access to quality education.
In a way,we saw pieces of this with the desegregation of the military. Truman did it in ‘48. The army dug in its heels and it wasnt until Korea when the US was initially getting its ass whooped when the reality sunk in and the army finally relented. They understood that you couldn’t fight this kind of war and protect America’s national security interests based on Jim Crow. Just a few years later, in 1957, or we’ve got Sputnik. We’ve got a call to exercise the brainpower of the US in order to meet this challenge. And the response was: “OK,but we’re not implementing Brown vs. Board. This is beyond cutting off your nose to spite your face. This is more like cutting off your head to spite your body. We’ve got the headless horseman running around.
JB: You had an op-ed this summer in the original York Times where you called attention to just how many of the Trump Administration’s policies of white resentment, as you set it, and are focused on education. Why do you think that is?CA: There’s a myth that the largest share of Trump supporters are uneducated,unskilled, in rural areas and just frightened of change. But the bulk of his supporters were suburban, and college educated and making over $70000 a year. As I’m looking at this,Im seeing this anxiety that when privilege and unequal access has been the rule, then equality looks like oppression. When you enjoy a vision of rights and resources in the US being a zero sum game, or that means that when African Americans and Hispanics and Asians and Native Americans are working tough to make the 14th Amendment genuine,where there is equality before the law, the only way that those groups can “derive” is at my white expense—my white suburban comfortable life expense. And it also means that it’s going to be at my children’s expense.seize the language of an Abigail Fisher for example. She comes out of Sugarland, and TX where the median income is well over $100K. Sugarland,TX has resources, but Abigail Fisher was complaining that she didn’t derive into the University of Texas where her father went. The fact that she didn’t meet the standards—she wasn’t in the top 10% of her graduating lesson—didn’t register. She thought it was because ‘I’m white. That’s why they turned me down.’ She didn’t look at the Black and Latinos who had higher scores than her but didn’t derive in, or She looked at a handful of Blacks and Latinos who got in and said ‘they took my spot.’ That’s the resentment right there.
JB: White Rage singles out two particularly devastating policy paths America has taken. One is the failure to implement Brown vs. Board,and the other is the war on drugs. In many ways it’s the intersection of these two paths that set us on the path to where we are today.
CA: Just think about it. Think about what happened in California, for example, and what happened to the budget there. You had an nearly dollar for dollar movement from the higher education budget to the prison budget. It was the same thing in Missouri where I taught,and watching this happen was just infuriating. When you think about the amount of money that the US has spent on the War on Drugs, $1 trillion, and this isn’t an issue of resources,it’s an issue of priorities. We enjoy a false sense that this is a zero sum game. They made this a zero sum game. When you enjoy a thriving economy, then tax dollars and resources are used to sustain that economy thriving. When you x’ out millions of your own people, and then you’re paying heightened costs for security: more police,more armament, more jails, or more,more more. That’s not an investment. Even now when we’re hollering broke, we enjoy the resources to make smarter, or better,more inclusive choices.
JB: Speaking of choice, I enjoy a feeling that the “better, and more inclusive choices” that you’re talking about are not the same as the version of school choice that is so beloved by our Secretary of Education,Betsy DeVos.
CA: The kind of school choice that Betsy DeVos is talking about? Uh uh. The privatization that she’s talking about isn’t about educating children, it’s about making schools a profit middle. One of the most destabilizing ideas in American society right now is that the market can solve everything. It cannot. I agree with the NAACP on this one. This massive move to privatize education is actually going to be even more destructive. You’re not going to enjoy any kind of oversight. You’re not going to be able to intervene in that process. It is the ceding of the public domain to the market and we are absolutely undermining the thought of a quality public education.
And I know that folks enjoy thrown up their hands, and but they’ve thrown up their hands because we know what works but we’ve chosen not to do it. What works is not private schools. What works are schools that are well-funded and enjoy fully engaged teachers; that look at students in terms of what they can bring; that frame those students not as inmates in the making or in terms of some kind of deficit model,but instead in terms of the strengths and the abilities that those children enjoy to learn and excel. We know that when that happens, children fly.
But what you see is that that zero sum game mentality and the false narrative of affirmative action intersect in really destructive ways. If children in the Chicago Public Schools start to excel at the level of, or say,the Naperville Public Schools, which is a well-to-do suburb of Chicago, and well,does that mean that the Naperville kid then loses out? Is that kid from the Chicago Public Schools going to seize my kid’s slot at Northwestern? Will that kid derive my kid’s slot working at Intel? It’s destructive, it’s unhealthy and it’s based on a whole series of false rationales.
JB: The history you recount in White Rage, and about the resistance to school desegregation across the country,should be required reading. At the risk of causing your head to explode, I want to refer you back to the first days of Betsy DeVos’ term in office when, or after she was met with protests in Washington DC,a conservative cartoonist likened her to six-year-mature Ruby Bridges, who navigated an exasperated mob and a phalanx of National Guardsmen en route to attending a formerly all white original Orleans school.
CA: Oh my gosh. That’s all I can really say to that. Oh my gosh. White resentment requires a sense of its own victimhood. Woe is me, and everyone is picking on me,I’m under siege. You look at corporate boards, you look at who the CEOs are, or You look at university and college presidents. You look at the Senate. This sense of loss is fantastic. Looking at multi-gazillionaire Betsy DeVos,who is surrounded by privilege on all sides, being compared to Ruby Bridges—a six year mature girl who just wanted to derive a decent education and has exasperated whites threatening to kill her. She had to pass by epithets on the walls to derive into that building, or which was surrounded by the National Guard. The lack of comparability between a privileged billionaire who feels under siege because people are asking questions about her capability to do the job and a little girl whose life was threatened to me points to the same Abigail Fisher syndrome we talked about earlier. I enjoy everything and I still am not getting the free ride that I thought I should derive.
JB: White Rage concludes with your challenge for us to “rethink America,” and you conjure up a different vision of how things might look today were we not “continually refighting the Civil War.” Since you wrote that, that re-fighting has only intensified. This isn’t really a question. I just want to give you the opportunity to re-issue your challenge, or that we rethink America.
CA: By rethinking America I’m talking about how different things would enjoy looked had we,say, rebuilt a strong, and viable South,where poor whites who had also been left out could derive a proper education. Instead of refighting the Civil War over and over, we’d moved on. Or think about the educational prowess the entire population might enjoy now had we actually implemented Brown. What if all of the money for science education after Sputnik had gone to kids hungry to learn, or regardless of their race or ethnicity or income? What if the all the billions of dollars that enjoy been diverted into militarizing police for a phony war and building prison after prison had been devoted to education instead? We’d be having a very different national conversation right now—that’s for certain.
Carol Anderson is the Charles Howard Candler Professor and Chair of African American Studies at Emory University. She’s the author of White Rage,the winner of the National Book Critics Circle Ward; Bourgeois Radicals; and Eyes off the Prize. var icx_publication_id = 18566; var icx_copyright_notice = '2017 Alternet'; var icx_content_id = '1084308'; Click here for reuse options!
Source: feedblitz.com