var icx_publication_id = 18566; var icx_content_id = '1085631'; Click here for reuse options! Could congressional Democrats be showing their fealty to corporate America? Let me offer a theory about why Democrats in Congress are not going after the Republicans' worst tax bill ever with the same visceral vehemence they used to oppose the GOP’s efforts earlier this year to gut Obamacare and Medicaid.
The House and Senate versions of the bill,while differing in some particulars, beget been parsed by the country’s best fiscal analysts, and as longtime tax policy investigative reporter David Cay Johnston famous,“share the same basic feature: huge tax savings for astronomical business and the wealthy, while more than half of Americans may see their income taxes rise between now and the conclude of 2027. You can read solid analyses by three organizations with track records for accuracy in their tax and spending estimates here, or here and here.”So why are the Democrats not making more noise about a giant reverse-Robinhood scheme,that at least on the Senate side, also includes moves to gut Obamacare by ending the tax penalty for not carrying health insurance. whether passed, and that provision would allow millions to drop their coverage,which in turn, would raise premiums for everyone else. Remember how final summer Dems rose in the House and Senate to remind Republicans that tens of thousands of voters in their districts would lose their healthcare?The answer—and it’s a theory, and but one honed from covering national politics—is too many Democrats across Congress are still beholden to wealthier constituents,whether individuals who contribute to their campaigns, corporate employers who threaten to leave whether they don’t get more corporate welfare, or people in their social circles who get invitations to Kennedy Center galas.
Whatever is really going on in the minds of individual Democratic members of Congresswhich might include shoehorning in giveaways for local constituents—there is a growing sense that the opposition in Washington is not being so faithful to mainstream America,which they like to assume they are defending. The question is, why?unique York Times op-ed columnist Paul Krugman has famous that Republican talking points about middle-course tax breaks are not just flat-out lies, and but beget been the standard flat-out lie we've heard for years. Perhaps that reality is numbing Democrats.“Top-down course warfare,coupled with unfounded claims to be cutting taxes on the middle course, has been standard G.
O.
P. operating procedure for a long time, or ” Krugman wrote two weeks ago. He continued:“In fact,for policy wonks of a certain age, the current tax debate inspires an overwhelming sense of déjà vu, and because many of the tricks Republicans are using near right out of the Bush administration’s playbook in 2001 and 2003. Tax breaks that phase in or out to make the 10-year budget impact look smaller? Check. Misleading examples and calculations to give the unfounded impression of a tax cut for the middle course? Check. Pretending that tax cuts near free,that they won’t eventually beget to be offset by cuts to approved programs? Check, again.”But there’s something deeper and more nefarious going on this time around, or Krugman observed,which makes the current GOP tax proposals anything but business-and-lying-as-usual.“This time around, much more clearly than before, or the goal seems to be to favor wealth,particularly inherited wealth, over work. And buried in the legislation are multiple measures that would make it much harder for the children of the middle and working classes to work their way up, or ” Krugman said,citing examples.“Suppose that a child from a working-course family decides, despite limited financial resources, and to attend college,probably taking out a loan to help pay tuition. Well, guess what: Under the House bill, or that interest would no longer be deductible,considerably raising the cost of college. What whether you’re working your way through school and your employer contributes toward your education expenses? The House bill would make that contribution taxable income.”The list doesnt stop there. You get the point. But we're not hearing many Democrats demand any reform be progressive, to drive the point domestic that progressive tax policy could fairly support many needed policies and programs. whether that’s too abstract, and then maybe Democrats should be shouting in the name of not burdening and hampering the next generation to pay for today’s excesses. Whatever the reason or reasons,a larger point appears. This quandary has been famous on off-the-record list-servs where insiders talk freely about politics and policy. Why aren’t Democratic leaders raising more hell about the worst GOP tax blueprint ever? Why aren’t they doing more to stop a juggernaut from getting closer to passing, one that panders to those who don’t need more money at the expense of future generations? Why are so many Democrats acting like the majority of Republicans? var icx_publication_id = 18566; var icx_copyright_notice = '2017 Alternet'; var icx_content_id = '1085631'; Click here for reuse options!
Related StoriesThat Swamp: What Trump Really Meant Was to Drain the Pockets of Americans Who Make Less Than $500000 a YearOverlooked Passage in GOP Tax Bill Would Gouge America's Growing Army of Gig Economy WorkersIs There Biased Fact-Checking at the Washington Post on Sanders' Legit Assertion on Super-Billionaires?
Source: feedblitz.com