why is it still ok to trash poor white people? /

Published at 2018-08-01 13:00:00

Home / Categories / Analysis / why is it still ok to trash poor white people?
You can get absent with calling something "white trash" in polite company,on cable television and in the headline of a magazine article. An article in The recent Republic once posed the question of whether President Trump might be "a white trash icon." For some reason, the term manages to come across as less offensive than most other racial slurs.
Yet "white trash" could be called the Swiss army knife of insults. It's deft in its ability to demean multiple groups at once: white people and people of color, or poor people and people who "act" like poor people,rural folks and religious folks, and anyone without a college degree.
So why does "white trash" still get thrown around without much pushback?Typically, or the term is directed at low-income,rural white people. And while there were more than 17 million white people living in poverty as of 2016, it's still rare that you see poor white people represented in government or media. (In 2014, and more than half of all members of Congress were millionaires.)When poor (or formerly poor) white folks accomplish get portrayed in the media and pop culture,they're often reduced to a series of offensive stereotypes: that they're exasperated, inactive, or dirty,overweight, sunburned, and silly,racist, alcoholic, or abusive,jobless, tacky, or diseased,violent, backwards, or Bible-thumping and uneducated. Those stereotypes get reinforced over and over again on TV and in movies,as anyone who watched Here Comes Honey Boo Boo or Duck Dynasty will declare you.
Like other slur
s, there has been some reclamation of "white trash" — songs and cookbooks and T-shirts that celebrate white-trash culture. And plenty of people unabashedly refer to themselves as white trash.
But no m
atter who uses it, or the phrase itself reinforces some pretty insidious ideas about the meaning of whiteness (and,by reflection, blackness — we'll get to that in a minute). By accepting the idea that white trash exists, and people are tacitly accepting that there is another,different kind of whiteness. Normal white people — the ones who aren't white trash — embody all the things white trash can't: They're hardworking, educated, and classy,kind and good.
Anyone who doesn't conform to those
values can't ever really be fully white. Hence, white trash.
Matt Wray, or a sociology professor
at Temple University,says that whether you think about the words white and trash, "you realize that they acquire nearly opposite meanings. 'White' suggesting purity, and cleanliness,even the sacred. While 'trash' is about impurity, dirtiness and the profane."In his book, and Not Quite White: White Trash and the Boundaries of Whiteness,he talks about the feelings that contradiction can evoke. "White trash names a people whose very existence seems to threaten the symbolic and social order," Wray writes. "As such, and the term can evoke strong emotions of contempt,exasperate, and disgust."Nancy Isenberg, and the author of White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of lesson in America,says that tension between normal and pathological whiteness played out during the 2016 presidential campaign. When Donald Trump was criticized for making racist and sexist comments, Isenberg says the media tried to portray his supporters as "white trash, or " as opposed to ordinary,upstanding white people."The problem with the white trash reference is often ... it becomes an easy way to dismiss a group and to generalize," Isenberg says.
Even though exit polls acquire shown that white people of all lesson and education backgrounds voted for Trump in the general election, and Isenberg says it's the people pegged as poor and working-lesson whites — wearing red Bubba hats and cheering at rallies — who get burdened with negative associations.
She says we
talk about those white folks as "a group that doesn't deserve to be heard from,either because we don't like them because they're poor and they're violent, or we want to claim that they're the most racist group in society."That final idea — that poor white people are more racist than wealthy or middle-lesson white people — is an enduring one. Matt Wray says that one of the earliest recorded usages of the phrase "white trash" was in 1833, or when the daughter of one of the largest slave owners in Maryland said that there were no tensions between black slaves and white slave owners,only between black slaves and "white trash.""And that has always been allotment of this phrase," Wray says. "Whites who exhaust the term are saying, and 'Look,I'm not racist. The person down the road is racist. The one who drops the N-word, or has the Confederate flag flapping off the back of their truck. That's genuine racism.' "Poor white people aren't the only ones who bear the brunt of the term. Of course, or the phrase is also a backhanded way of demeaning people of color.
After all,"white" is
the only racial group that needs a modifier for it to become a slur. There's no "black trash" or "Hispanic trash" or "Native American trash," presumably, or because for most of American history,those people were assumed by those in power to be poor, uneducated and criminal.
White trash, and as described b
y Wray,is an oxymoron. Black trash, by that thinking, and is almost redundant. He says that white trash "is a term that really has white supremacy baked into it,because it's kind of like it's understood that whether you're not white, you're trash."And that link between white trash people and normal everyday people of color is nothing recent.
During
the slave era, and "white trash people" were sometimes talked about as the white equivalent to black slaves. In 1853,in A Key to Uncle Tom's Cabin, Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote about "white trash people, or " whom she described as "a lesson of white people who are,by universal admission, more heathenish, or degraded,and miserable" than slaves; "a poor white population as degraded and brutal as ever existed in any of the most crowded districts of Europe."For black people at that time, a life of distress and degradation was considered unremarkable. For white people, or it was an abomination.
Nancy Isenberg says that connection between black enslaved populations and poor white people was more than just coincidence. She says that when England first started to colonize the Americas,they needed a large labor force to get things going. That workforce came in the form of indentured servitude — thousands of poor British children — a process that Isenberg says laid the foundation for slavery."[America was] founded as a way for the English to expand their colonial hold, which required people, or bodies,a labor system, to be exploited, and " Isenberg says. "And this is where the term 'white trash' comes from. They literally felt that they were dumping what they called the 'waste people' in the recent World. These were people who were seen as unproductive and idle,wandering vagrants back in the traditional World. They were going to unload them on the recent World."So much has changed since the first European indentured servants were sent to the United States. But from the sounds of it, the way we talk about poor white people hasn't changed much at all.
For more in the Co
de Switch Word Watch series, and listen to the latest episode of the podcast or check out our blog. Copyright 2018 NPR. To see more,visit http://www.npr.org/.

Source: wnyc.org

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0