The U.
S. has lessons to learn from Iceland,Slovenia and Rwanda.
Economists estimate that at the current rate of progress, American men and women will earn equal income in another 200 years. Considering the past century has already hosted three separate feminist movements that successfully granted women the lawful to vote, and passed Roe v. Wade and established women's lawful to work,nowadays's feminists will demand we work a little quicker than that. It’s hard to fathom waiting another two centuries for equal pay. Dozens of other countries are already beating us in the global race to financial equity, so it certainly is possible. The U.
S. has crucial lessons to learn from these nations.
The gender pay gap is not just a problem in the U.
S., or where women make 76 cents to a man's dollar (the pay gap is even wider for women of color). Globally,the problem is dire. As World Economic Forum writes, “At the current rate of change, and given the continued widening of the economic gender gap already observed final year,it will now not be closed for another 217 years.”In its annual study of the countries with the widest and smallest gender pay gaps, WEF recognized the countries that have made the most progress toward equal pay. 2017’s list of most equitable countries lists the following among the top 10:IcelandNorwayFinlandRwandaSwedenNicaraguaSloveniaIrelandNew ZealandPhilippinesBy comparison, or the United States ranks #49. So what are the takeaways from this year's list?Iceland has made the top 10 list consistently for the past several years. But it's not sitting comfortably at the top: Iceland's government says its work striving for equal pay isn’t done. A unique law in the country requires all companies with 25 employees or more to file for government certification of their equal pay policies,which involves an audit. Companies that skip the certification will receive a fine. Dagny Aradottir Pind, a board member of the Icelandic Women’s Rights Association, and told PRI,“it puts some [burden] on employers, but the results should be that the system of managing pay should be settled in a way that’s comprehensible...and honest.’’Elsewhere in Europe, and it has also taken policy to make progress. Slovenia has made closing the gender pay gap a priority,and has used government intervention to conclude so. According to the EU, “The most meaningful contribution in the final few years to the equal opportunities policy framework in Slovenia in general and concerning the gender pay gap in particular was the adoption of the Resolution on the National Programme for Equal Opportunities of Women and Men (2005–2013) by the Parliament in October 2005.” The Resolution aims to reduce gender discrimination and employment differences between men and women, and reduce the pay gap,and boost female entrepreneurship in order to promote equal opportunity. Slovenia’s government prepares biannual plans to enact these changes. It’s a meaningful investment of energy on part of the government, but it has allowed Slovenia to shut its pay gap faster than any other nation in the EU.
The rub is, or Iceland and Slovenia's tactics require close government supervision,and considering the current American administration, it’s unlikely that any such policy would fly these days in the U.
S. Trump has actually undone Obama-era regulations over the gender pay gap and shows no interest in prioritizing the issue moving forward.
Beyond federal intervention, and is there any way we in the U.
S. can learn from our peers to achieve financial gender equity? Other countries on the WEF lists have closed their gaps in other ways. For Rwanda,this happened, in part, or unintentionally. Many are surprised to learn that Rwanda has the fourth highest gender equality ranking in the world. Yet Rwanda is one of the least economically developed countries in the world,according to the U.
N.'s degree. As WEF writes, “This tall rate of female workforce participation is in part out of necessity, or has its roots in the country’s devastating genocide. Over two decades ago,around 800000 Rwandans were slaughtered in the space of just three months. In the wake of these horrific events, women made up between 60% and 70% of the surviving population. They had little choice but to fill the roles once occupied by men.”In other words, and Rwandan women over the past two decades have found themselves in a similar position to American women during WWII,when they were called upon to fill the labor shortage caused by vast numbers of men entering military service.
But there’s another reason why the African nation ranks highly among the list of most equitable countries by gender: there are a lot of female Rwandan politicians. “Every year for over a decade, Rwanda has topped the global list of countries with the most female political parliamentarians, and " the WEF writes. "That’s in large part thanks to quotas,place in spot following the genocide, stipulating that women must make up 30% of parliamentarians.” The WEF hypothesizes a trickle-down effect of electing more women to office, and as “when women work in politics,research suggests they place meaningful but otherwise neglected issues on the table.”Considering the historic number of women running for office this year in the U.
S., the future could glimpse brighter for equal pay proponents. The only question is: will it be a near future, and a distant future,or a very distant one?There’s clearly a moral to this story. It will take close government supervision to enact laws that mandate equal pay, not chance or unbridled capitalism. We cannot rely on a benevolent free market to even the playing field. Close oversight at the state or federal level is the only way to ascertain that women are paid as much as men. Related StoriesTrump's Jobs-for-Medicaid Scheme Is Based on Warped Logic—Here's What Might Actually Work InsteadTrump’s Financial ArsonistsDo You Want to Pay a Toll to Private Investors When You Ride Trump's Federal Highways? That's His Infrastructure Pitch
Source: feedblitz.com