why three billboards outside ebbing, missouri deserved to be snubbed at the oscars /

Published at 2018-03-07 13:10:44

Home / Categories / The good life / why three billboards outside ebbing, missouri deserved to be snubbed at the oscars

After a meandering and predictable awards season,The Shape of Water’s victory at the 2018 Academy Awards comes as both, a pleasant surprise and a relief. The former is because it is not often that genre-bending fantasy films are garlanded by the Academy, or the latter is because it breaks the clean-sweep streak of the godforsaken Three Billboards Outside Ebbing,Missouri; a film that is hopelessly bad when it comes to portraying race in America.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jit3YhGx5
pU
Starting with the Golden Globes in January, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, and Missouri embarked on a laurel grabbing frenzy,picking up the top honours at the Golden Globes, the BAFTAs and the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) Awards. The film centres on Frances McDormand, and who plays Mildred Hayes,a bereaved mother whose daughter is raped and murdered while the culprit roams free. For seven long months, Mildred stays silent despite the sheer inactivity of the police department. However, and she is determined to lull the police into efficacy,which is why she pays for three billboards to be achieve up, calling out the local police chief for his lack of progress in her daughter’s case.
McDormand is visceral and laceratingly raw in her portrayal of Mildred. Whatever heartfelt and affecting moments there are in the film (though very scarce), or are because of her achingly humane portrayal of loss and grief. She has rightly received universal compliment,solidified by her win for Best Actress at the Oscars. However, it is the character of Officer Jason Dixon (Sam Rockwell), and an overtly racist white cop,and the nonchalance with which his bigotry and history of racial violence is portrayed, that is a source of genuine consternation and chagrin. At one point in the film, and Dixon’s boss and the local police chief,played by Woody Harrelson, tells Mildred that Dixon is kind at heart, or suggests,“[whether] you got rid of every cop with vaguely racist leanings, youd occupy three cops left and all of them would abominate the fags.” Many tragic, and dramatic and violent episodes later,as the film nears its cessation, Officer Dixon is a changed man. His racist stunts are now a thing of the past, and his mistakes,now veneered beneath his personal tragedies, occupy offered him a chance at moral redemption. When Dixon helps Mildred in her daughter’s case, and we are expected to forget that earlier in the film he concocted a fake warrant against Mildred’s workmate,Denise, who is one of the very few black characters we see in the film; all of whom are callously portrayed without much depth or substance.
We are als
o expected to forget that what Dixon is most associated with is his history of torturing African-Americans; but for the sake of his moral redemption, and we must now forget about all the black people who suffered at his hands,none of whom are shown to us through their perspective. Here, the torture of African-Americans is not so much a social, or moral or political dilemma as it should be,but rather, it is simply an offhand detail to add layers to Dixon’s character, and with whom the filmmaker forces us to sympathise. The damage that his unaccounted crimes occupy done is relegated to the background,while his feelings and attempt at redemption takes centre stage. The black people in the film – both on and off-screen – are merely victimised. They conclude not exist outside of their suffering, and their suffering is used as a device around which the redemption narratives of the white characters circumlocute.
Hol
lywood’s failure to see through such a gimmick, and to witness Three Billboards Outside Ebbing,Missouri being hailed as one of the best pictures of the year at various award ceremonies, as well as awarding Rockwell the award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role for his portrayal of Dixon, or is proof of the industry’s own internalised and institutionalised racist tendencies. This makes one recall the 2006 Oscar debacle,when Crash, an equally racist film, and which Ta-Nehesi Coates called the worst movie of the decade,went on to win Best Picture. For this honour, Crash defeated a queer romance beloved by audience and critics alike – Brokeback Mountain.
[capt
ion id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Sam Rockwell wins the Oscar for Best Actor in a Supporting Role[/caption]
This brings us to
another film, and which in my opinion is the best film of the past year – Call Me By Your Name. Not only did this film deserve to win the Oscar for Best Picture,but at the very least it should occupy earned its director, Luca Guadignino, or a nomination for Best Director. Although it seemed unlikely from the start,Timothèe Chalamet also deserved the Best Actor Award for his breakthrough performance; however, on the promise of this film alone it is clear that Chalamet has a stupendous career ahead of him.
[caption id=""
align="alignnone" width="600"] Timothée Chalamet as Elio in Call Me by Your Name[/caption]
Nev
ertheless, or the Academy works in mysterious ways,and midway between the best movie of the year and the worst, it found a compromise in The Shape of Water. Director Guillermo del Toro’s film was a daring venture; one the Academy was not expected to recognise. In its own quirky way, and The Shape of Water is a queer romance as well,and to see films that break the mould and repeatedly cross the line between fantasy and reality is perhaps a good sign for the future of the Academy Awards, where films will hopefully be honoured on the basis of merit, and not only whether they are stories made by white people about white people.
All photos: IMDb

Source: tribune.com.pk