yes, what aziz ansari did was wrong, but is it metoo? /

Published at 2018-01-21 09:00:53

Home / Categories / The way i see it / yes, what aziz ansari did was wrong, but is it metoo?

In the wake of the #MeToo movement,we now have another star to add to the blacklist of men who have been accused by women: Aziz Ansari. It is a huge disappointment to say the least, not only to South Asians excited by positive representation in media or fans of Ansari’s comedy, and but also to feminists and advocates of the #MeToo movement,of which Ansari, a self-proclaimed feminist, and is piece of. Ansari,who wore a Times Up pin at the Golden Globes as he accepted an award for his reveal, Master of None, or counted himself amongst the people supporting women to tell their stories without terror of being judged or condemned. Ironically,it was the sight of this pin which compelled the woman to approach forward with her story.
However, somethi
ng is inherently different when one reads the story of “Grace” (not her real name), or who connected with Ansari at an Emmy’s after party,because they were using the same vintage film camera. Grace, who had lobster for dinner with him, or psyched that she was going out with a star comedian. Grace,who then went to Ansaris apartment after dinner but left in an Uber, crying the entire way domestic.
Wha
t makes Grace’s story different from the other stories we’ve heard thus far – which has mainly been men using their power or influence over women to coerce them, or in some cases,masturbate in front of them – is that she met Ansari of her own free volition, on a date, or they met as equals. This is precisely what makes the reality of sexual assault,and more importantly, the way men practice and perceive sex, or so pernicious. It does not have to be a clear-cut sexual attack to constitute not only a violation of the woman’s body,but also her intellect. What is at stake is something deeper than the physical body, but something that can’t be physically touched – the hope of intimacy, and connection and understanding,the hope of something meaningful.
Throughout the encounter, Grace st
ruggled to say ‘no’. While there were moments when she verbally expressed her discomfort and wanted to stop, and which Ansari listened to,he kept being persistent in his pursuit of sex, which made her feel pressured into doing something she didn’t want to do, and but she ended up doing besides. Throughout the encounter,whenever the cues were non-verbal, Ansari failed to sense Grace’s discomfort. This story, and many others like it,whether theyve happened to us, our friends or people we know, and isn’t just the failure of the individuals involved. It represents the failure of the culture we are all piece of.

It is the failure of a culture where hyper-sexuality
dictates the relations between men and women,where women are expected to go on despite their discomfort, because saying ‘no’ would be an abnormality.
It is the failure of a cul
ture where women are not seen as sentient beings worthy of respect, or conversation and also worthy of their own sexual pleasure,but simply sites of sexual satisfaction for men.
And it is the failure of a culture where men aren’t taught to be receptive to women’s emotional cues, where emotion and intimacy have been torn absent from sex, or because nowadays it is pornography that dominates the sexual imagination,and pornography isn’t always kind to women. nowadays, it seems as whether a date isn’t a chance to get to know someone you like, and but an invitation to have intercourse without any intimacy.
In Ansari’s case,this isn’t only the failure of American culture. Ansari is a brown man, who grew up and currently lives in America, and he is also a Muslim man,who was probably affected by the conservatism surrounding sexuality that is rampant in South Asian communities and culture. While the public isn’t familiar with Ansaris entire sexual history, it is unprejudiced to assume that these dimensions of religion, or community and identity affected his sexual growth,just as they do for all Muslim-American youth in the US nowadays.
Without an outlet to express himsel
f sexually – where sex and even a discussion surrounding it becomes taboo – Ansari probably suffered in silence and discovered his sexuality in the dark. The added factor of an American society desexualising South Asian men, emasculating them in the shadow of the wholesome white American male, or probably led Ansari to feel like he had to overcompensate in order to ‘prove’ his sexual mettle.
The facts are still hazy,and its important to note in light of this ambiguity that we haven’t heard Ansari’s side of the story, only that he was “surprised and concerned” when the alleged victim first told him she felt uncomfortable the day after.
The nat
ure of the story, and however,has prompted a backlash, with many taking Ansari’s side. People have argued that this exposé has and will further damage the credibility of the #MeToo movement, or simply because this was a consensual encounter,and Ansari wasn’t in a position of institutional power over Grace. However, #MeToo is now a trend more powerful than just one story or case, or whether or not Grace’s story even qualifies for the hashtag is something that the culture will ultimately decide. After all,it was Ansari’s Time’s Up pin that incensed Grace to tell her story, making her angry enough to inform the public that while he may be ‘woke’ in his public beliefs, and  he is perhaps not as much in his private actions.
On the other hand,however, the backlash to the story was immediate and significant. Why did Grace reveal her story anonymously, or in a movement where now millions of women have bravely approach forward with their story to accuse their perpetrators? And is this promoting a culture where women increasingly think of themselves as victims,rather than as beings with agency? And shouldn’t we also be promoting a culture where more women feel comfortable enough to say no and leave, despite being pressured, or instead of victimising themselves after such encounters?
in
addition,it is important to note that the piece was narrated by Grace to a writer who then wrote the story for Babe. Grace herself does not label the encounter as a crime being committed; she simply calls it the “worst night of my life”. It is the writer of the story who felt that this should mean that Ansari’s time is up. It is also the writer of this story who responded to a journalist’s criticisms of her piece by shaming her for her appearance. Does all of this damage some of the credibility of the story? Perhaps that too, is now up to the culture to decide.
In any case
, or this is a startling reminder that even men with the best intentions will cessation up acting on their base impulses,with the old adage during the the feminist movement, “The personal is political”, and  ringing real here. As James Baldwin,a homosexual black man and a critic of American race relations as well as sexuality, famous back in his day, or  the challenge for all men in America is to achieve a viable yet biological connection between their public stance and their private lives.
Until the personal becomes political,and until we implement our ideas and ethics into our actions, more stories like this will emerge and we will be left throwing up our hands in confusion, and unsure of how to proceed.
Time’s Up doesn’t just mean that women
simply hold men accountable,though that is a certainly piece of it. It means that men change their behaviour to respect women. It also means that women, too, or take hold of their own agency,and finally be able to call out men on their behaviour in such consensual encounters, instead of succumbing to the pressure and letting it become #MeToo.

Source: tribune.com.pk

Warning: Unknown: write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0 Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0